LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) can coordinate the store of the whole sum or more

DETAILS

  • Name of the case : Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Ltd versus Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and others
  • A bench including Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna set out a proclamation for a situation including the understanding of Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, which endorses pre-store for recording request before the NCDRC.
  • The inquiry under the steady gaze of the Court was whether the equivalent can be supposed to be the base add up to be stored or regardless of whether the NCDRC was blocked from coordinating the store of sum higher than half of the sum dictated by the SCDRC.
  • The Supreme Court held that Section 51 doesn't remove the force of NCDRC to coordinate the store of the whole sum. Likewise, the requests against the NCDRC orders were excused.

QUESTIONS

  • Do you agree with the decision of the Supreme Court ?
  • What is the main objective of The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 ?

Share your views in the comments section below.

"Loved reading this piece by Yogeshwari Sirsikar?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  62  Report



Comments
img