LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

  • In the lack of any specific provisions, the Supreme Court noted that Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure would likewise apply to the Special Acts. 
  • The bench further stated that this rule must be followed to the letter and that a bail application is not even necessary in cases of this kind, especially where the reasons for the delay are not the accused's fault. 
  • In the decision Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, these observations were made. The bench noted that Act 25 of 2005 added Section 436A to the Code.
  • In accordance with this clause, the court may release a person on his or her personal bond with or without sureties after detention that has lasted up to half the maximum sentence allowed for that offence. 
  • Particularly when an appeal or admission is ongoing, the word "trial" will need to be given a wider definition. This clause has a commendable goal behind it, especially in terms of providing bail. 
  • This clause limits the amount of time an under-trial prisoner may be held. The custody of the accused during the investigation, inquiry, and trial must be taken into account during this time.
  • In order to bring an appeal under Section 436A in a situation where it has been pending for a longer period of time, the length of all detention must be taken into account. 
  • The term "must" make it clear that this regulation must be followed at all times. In our opinion, a bail application is not even necessary in a situation of this kind, especially if the defendant is not to blame for the delay. 
  • We are also aware that the public prosecutor must be consulted before a decision is made, and the court must consult with the public if it believes that detention should continue for more than half of the allotted time.
  • To be clear, in the absence of any other provision, the requirement included in Section 436A of the Code would likewise apply to the Special Acts. 
  • After all, there wouldn't be many witnesses in these kinds of situations, and extending the trial might not be warranted. 
  • Perhaps adherence to this Court's instructions and closer adherence to Section 309 of the Code are required in order to accelerate the procedure.
     
"Loved reading this piece by Twinkle Madaan?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  121  Report



Comments
img