The Supreme Court of India has expressed its disappointment with the decision of National Law University (NLU), Tripura to cancel hundreds of admissions for its current academic session (2022-23) due to 'lack of buildings and faculty'.A Three ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Pancham Lal Pandey vs Neeraj Kumar Mishra, the Supreme Court reiterated that the provision related to review is not there to go over and determine the correctness of a decision. A Division Bench of Justice V. Ramasubramani ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Sivankalai v. The State and Ors., the Madras High Court granted bail to a man accused of misbehaving with a woman belonging to the SC/ST community. A Single Judge Bench of Justice G Ilangova observed that although the man& ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Nripendra Chandra Mahanta v. Smt. Pramila Mahanta, the Calcutta HC directed the District Judge, Cooch Behar to decide the application for alimony filed u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act by a wife in compliance with the direc ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Sr. Sephy v. CBI & Ors., the Delhi HC held that the virginity test of Sister Sephy, an accused in the 1992 Sr. Abhaya murder case is unconstitutional. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma called it to b ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Rabi Saha @ Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, the Calcutta HC held that taking off a minor victim's pants when she herself refused to do so would amount to an attempt to commit the offence of rape. A Single Judge Bench o ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In S v. V, the Madras High Court noted that grounds for dissolution of a marriage are of continuing nature which means that a subsequent divorce petition cannot be said to be hit by res judicata. A single judge bench of Justic ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY?In Jagrati Trade Services Pvt Ltd v. Deepak Bhargava & Ors., the Calcutta HC observed that after the 2015 Amendment Act, the powers of an Arbitrator with regards to granting interim measures u/s 17 of the of the Arbitration ..
WHAT DID THE SC SAY?In Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Ex-Employees Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., the Supreme Court held that those employees who retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) are not at pari ..
WHAT DID THE SC SAY? In Anushka Rengunthwar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court held that the 2021 notification issued by the Union Government related to taking away of rights of Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) category studen ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
