In the case of Usha Giri vs State of Maharashtra the Bombay HC has made it clear that if the undertaking to take care of the aged mother-in-law is not followed through, the compassionate appointment given to the widow ought to be cancelled. The Bo ..
Limitation Period Under Section 468 CrPC Not Applicable To Section 12 Of DV Act: SC In the case of Kamatchi vs Lakshmi Narayanan the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the limitation period provided under section 468 of CrPC is inapplicable to ..
In the case of ABC vs Union of India, the Hon’ble Bombay HC has ordered the removal of an acquittal order from the HC website upon an application moved by the applicant/accused who was facing difficulties in getting a job due to the order of a ..
In Dental Council of India vs. Biyani Shikshan Samiti (2022), Justices L Nageswara Rao and B R Gavai observed that to guarantee that suitable academic standards, atmosphere, and infrastructure are maintained, the liberty to establish an educational ..
In the case of Kamatchi vs Lakshmi Narayanan the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the limitation period provided under section 468 of CrPC is inapplicable to the filing of an application under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Dome ..
Promise To Marry Made To A Married Woman Not Legally Enforceable: Cannot Attract The Rigors Of Section 376 IPC: Kerala HC In the case of X vs State of Kerala, the Hon’ble Kerala HC has observed that a promise of marriage given to a woman who is ..
In the case of X vs State of Kerala, the Hon’ble Kerala HC has observed that a promise of marriage given to a woman who is already married is not legally enforceable by law and thus, cannot be a good ground for the prosecution to argue that th ..
Period Of Detention For The Purpose Of 167(2) CrPC To Be Done Afresh If Additional Offence Found: Rajasthan HC In Akheraj vs State of Rajasthan the Hon’ble Rajasthan HC has reiterated that the right to seek default bail under section 167(2) of ..
In M/s. A. Seating & Others v. M/s. Nandini Modulars (2021), Justice HP Sandesh observed that the Appellate court has the authority to remand the case for a new hearing on the matter of condonation of delay under Section 142(b) of the Act if the ..
In R. Geethabanu v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Yamuna Devi(Died) v. Abdul Raheem and Ors, the bench of Justice Rmt. Teeka Raman observed that Motor Vehicles Act and Workmen's Compensation Act are no longer a part of good law and that an indivi ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
