In the case of Dadhibal Prasad Jaiswal vs Smt. Sunita Jaiswal the Madhya Pradesh HC has observed that an order rejecting an application under section 91 of CrPC is an interlocutory order against which no revision lies. Section 91 of CrPC provides fo ..
In the case of Beksy A vs. District Collector and ors. the Kerala HC has once again reiterated that marriage of an individual of a particular caste to another as is permissible under law is of no relevance for the purpose of claiming maintenance und ..
In Umadevi Nambiar vs. Thamarasseri Roman Catholic Diocese (2022), a bench consisting of J. Hemant Gupta and J. V. Ramasubramanian held a Power of Attorney (GPA) document, when rigorously interpreted, does not include the power to sell. Furthermore, ..
Plaint To Be Rejected When Relief Sought Is To Restrain Defendant From Initiating Prosecution Against Plaintiff: SC In the case of M/s Frost International Limited vs M/s Milan Developers and Builders Pvt Ltd. and anr. the Apex Court has held that a r ..
The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana HC has reiterated in Ravi Prakash Sharma vs. State of Punjab that directions to take voice samples of the accused is not violative of the doctrine against self-incrimination as envisaged in Article 20(3) of the C ..
In the case of M/s Frost International Limited vs M/s Milan Developers and Builders Pvt Ltd. and anr. the Apex Court has held that a relief sought in the plaint with the objective of restraining a prosecution against the plaintiff will be barred by ..
In Bhagyashri v Jagdish (2021), Justice Bharati Dangre, while rejecting the wife's plea under Section 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, upheld two civil court orders, which directed the wife, a teacher, to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 3000 ..
Mere Non Framing Of Charge U/S 149 IPC Will Not Vitiate Conviction If No Prejudice Caused To Accused: SC In the case of State of UP vs Subhash @ Pappu the Apex Court has reiterated a well known principle that if the ingredients of the section are obv ..
In Pedapudi Alfred Johnson Jeyakaran Jesudasan V. The State of AP, Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao, under Section 18 of the Indian Stamp Act of 1899, ruled that if a General Power of Attorney (GPA) is executed outside of India without being duly stamped ..
Every once in a while, we come face to face with the realisation that revenge really does not know any boundaries, and that people can really go to any lengths to seek it. Something like this has happened in the case of The State of Maharashtra vs. ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
