What Did The Centre Say In Vinu Madhavan v. State Bank of India, the Kerala High Court held that if the borrower has fully paid the loan amount, then the bank cannot withhold security documents of a mortgaged property on the grounds that during the t ..
A delegation of the Supreme Court of Kenya which was led by the Hon'ble Chief Justice Martha Koome visited India last week. They were invited to the Rashtrapati Bhavan where they met President Droupadi Murmu along with Professor SP Singh Baghel, ..
What Did The Centre Say In Supriyo @ Supriyo Chakraborthy v. Union of India, the Centre said that union of two people of opposite genders is a prerequisite for marriage. Hetrosexual marriages have always been the norm in India and will always be the ..
Slide 2 (Decision of the Bar Council) In an unprecedented move, the Bar Council has decided to permit foreign laws to practice in India. The Bar Council has stated that the foreign lawyers will be allowed to practice in selected areas. The areas of p ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY?In Debidutta Mohanty v. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik & Ors., the Supreme Court held that a Collector is authorised under Rule 51(7) of the Orissa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016 (OMMC) to cancel a lease deed on ground of non ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Indore Development Authority v. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Sneh Nagar & Ors., the Supreme Court held that in land acquisition proceedings which are related to public purpose schemes, the authorities s ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY?In the State of Gujarat And Ors. v. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust And Anr., the Supreme Court of India noted that if an employee is in service at a registered minority Secondary School receiving Aid from the State Government, th ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY?In Yogesh Upadhyay vs Atlanta Limited, the Supreme Court of India has noted that Section 406 CrPC empowers the courts to transfer cheque cases from one state to another.In a Division Bench of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justi ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. v. Krishan Kumar & Ors., the Supreme Court set aside the judgement of the Delhi High Court and held that the land acquisition proceedings related to the present case have not lapsed u ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Shelly Oberoi and Ors. v. Office of Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, the Supreme Court noted that the nominated members are not allowed to vote in the election of Mayor of Municipal Corporation of Delhi. A Three-Judge Bench of ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
