In the case of Abhishek vs State of Madhya Pradesh the Madhya Pradesh HC has termed live-in relationships as the by-product of Article 21 which promotes lascivious behaviours. The Court also observed that the people who want to exploit this freedom ..
In Father Of Prosecutrix-X v State Of Madhya Pradesh (2021), Justice R.K. Dubey, while dealing with the implementation for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC filed by the Prosecutrix's father, noted that the Prosecutrix's medical ..
Gift Of Ancestral Property Of HUF Can Only Be For ‘Pious Purposes’, Cannot Be ‘Out Of Love And Affection’: SC In the case of KC Laxmana vs KC Chandrappa Gowda the Apex Court has held that a Hindu Father or any other member of ..
In the case of B.P. @ Amrat Singh Gurjar vs State of MP the Madhya Pradesh HC has granted bail to a man arrested on the basis of the confessional statement of a co-accused. The Court observed that lately, it has become a norm for the police to file ..
Denial Of Sex ‘Cruelty’ But Not ‘Exceptional Hardship’ For The Purpose Of Section 14 Of HMA: Cooling Priod Cannot Be Waived: Delhi HC In the case of Rishu Aggarwal vs Mohit Goyal the Delhi HC has held that the denial of conjug ..
In the case of KC Laxmana vs KC Chandrappa Gowda the Apex Court has held that a Hindu Father or any other member of Hindu Undivided Family has power to make a gift of ancestral property only for a pious purpose and the same cannot be done out of lov ..
In Muhammed Hasheer Poolakkal v. United Arab Bank & Anr. (2022), Justice Ziyad Rahman AA observed, while evaluating the legislative intent behind implementing Chapter VIIA of the CrPC, that allowing any individual or institution to file an appli ..
In the case of Kailash Chandra Panda and ors. vs. State of Orissa and ors. the Orissa HC has held that a revision petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is not maintainable before the HC against the order of the District Cou ..
In the case of Rishu Aggarwal vs Mohit Goyal the Delhi HC has held that the denial of conjugal relationship does not amount to ‘exceptional hardship’ or ‘exceptional depravity’ and thus, cannot be a ground for waving of the m ..
In Dr. Papia Mukherjee v. Aruna Banerjee and Others, Chief Justice Prakash Srivastava (in a single-judge bench) held that the death of a party does not discharge an arbitration agreement. The agreement remains enforceable by/against the legal repres ..