LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Lawyersclubindia News


Live-In Relationships A By-Product Of Article 21: Promotes Promiscuity, Lascivious Behaviour: Madhya Pradesh HC

   21 April 2022 at 10:30

In the case of Abhishek vs State of Madhya Pradesh the Madhya Pradesh HC has termed live-in relationships as the by-product of Article 21 which promotes lascivious behaviours. The Court also observed that the people who want to exploit this freedom ..

Posted in Others |   116 Views


Madhya Pradesh HC Relied On Two Finger Test To Cancel Bail: Mere Delay In Lodging FIR Not Fatal To Prosecution Case

   21 April 2022 at 10:30

In Father Of Prosecutrix-X v State Of Madhya Pradesh (2021), Justice R.K. Dubey, while dealing with the implementation for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC filed by the Prosecutrix's father, noted that the Prosecutrix's medical ..

Posted in Others |   199 Views


Top News Headlines 20th Apr 2022: Gift Of Ancestral Property Of HUF Can Only Be For ‘Pious Purposes’, Cannot Be ‘Out Of Love And Affection’

   21 April 2022 at 09:46

Gift Of Ancestral Property Of HUF Can Only Be For ‘Pious Purposes’, Cannot Be ‘Out Of Love And Affection’: SC In the case of KC Laxmana vs KC Chandrappa Gowda the Apex Court has held that a Hindu Father or any other member of ..

Posted in Others |   71 Views


Madhya Pradesh HC Grants Bail To Man Arrested On The Confession Of The Co-accused

   20 April 2022 at 17:51

In the case of B.P. @ Amrat Singh Gurjar vs State of MP the Madhya Pradesh HC has granted bail to a man arrested on the basis of the confessional statement of a co-accused. The Court observed that lately, it has become a norm for the police to file ..

Posted in Others |   216 Views


Top News Headlines 19th Apr 2022: Denial Of Sex ‘Cruelty’ But Not ‘Exceptional Hardship’ For The Purpose Of Section 14 Of HMA

   20 April 2022 at 16:27

Denial Of Sex ‘Cruelty’ But Not ‘Exceptional Hardship’ For The Purpose Of Section 14 Of HMA: Cooling Priod Cannot Be Waived: Delhi HC In the case of Rishu Aggarwal vs Mohit Goyal the Delhi HC has held that the denial of conjug ..

Posted in Others |   64 Views


Gift Of Ancestral Property Of HUF Can Only Be For Pious Purposes, Cannot Be Out Of Love And Affection: SC

   20 April 2022 at 16:27

In the case of KC Laxmana vs KC Chandrappa Gowda the Apex Court has held that a Hindu Father or any other member of Hindu Undivided Family has power to make a gift of ancestral property only for a pious purpose and the same cannot be done out of lov ..

Posted in Others |   172 Views


Under Chapter VIIA CrPC, Indian Courts Are Unapproachable By Private Parties For Seeking Attachment Of Properties In Foreign States : Kerala HC

   20 April 2022 at 11:31

In Muhammed Hasheer Poolakkal v. United Arab Bank & Anr. (2022), Justice Ziyad Rahman AA observed, while evaluating the legislative intent behind implementing Chapter VIIA of the CrPC, that allowing any individual or institution to file an appli ..

Posted in Others |   129 Views


Decision Of The District Court Given In Appeal/Revision Are Beyond The Revisional Jurisdiction Of The HC: Orissa HC

   19 April 2022 at 10:24

In the case of Kailash Chandra Panda and ors. vs. State of Orissa and ors. the Orissa HC has held that a revision petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is not maintainable before the HC against the order of the District Cou ..

Posted in Others |   150 Views


Denial Of Sex ‘Cruelty’ But Not ‘Exceptional Hardship’ For The Purpose Of Section 14 Of HMA: Cooling Priod Cannot Be Waived: Delhi HC

   19 April 2022 at 09:58

In the case of Rishu Aggarwal vs Mohit Goyal the Delhi HC has held that the denial of conjugal relationship does not amount to ‘exceptional hardship’ or ‘exceptional depravity’ and thus, cannot be a ground for waving of the m ..

Posted in Others |   335 Views


Death Of The Party Does Not Discharge Liability In Arbitration Agreement; Enforceable Against LRs : Calcutta HC

   19 April 2022 at 09:58

In Dr. Papia Mukherjee v. Aruna Banerjee and Others, Chief Justice Prakash Srivastava (in a single-judge bench) held that the death of a party does not discharge an arbitration agreement. The agreement remains enforceable by/against the legal repres ..

Posted in Others |   140 Views