Is CBI correct in not opposing bail pleas of Kanimozhi and others in 2G scam? |
|
| Yes | 36 % |
 |
|
| No | 62 % |
|
|
|
| Can't say | 2 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 197 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by aruntrivedi |
06/11/2011 19:47:15 |
| It is not fairness of justice when they are not opposing as thwy complaint is filed by CBI before Judiciary - without filing Complaint even after committing fraud is that not that she was out without any bail.If she has not committed crime and the crime not so serous the CBI should have not opposed at the time first hearing. | |
| Posted by Advocate Bhartesh goyal |
06/11/2011 11:40:31 |
| It seems that CBI is influenced by politicians. | |
| Posted by Nadeem Qureshi |
04/11/2011 17:05:06 |
| according to me CBI is prosecution and prosecution duty is punished the accused, so it is mandatory to oppose the bail of all the 2G accused before the Hon'ble Court. | |
| Posted by NOTTAM VENKATASAMY |
04/11/2011 13:47:18 |
| CBI AS WELL AS CENTRAL GOVT ALSO TARGETTED THE DMK REGIME BY WAY OF KANI BAIL, THIS TYPE OF DENIED WILL LEADS TO FAVOUR OF KANI IT WILL THE ADVANTAGE OF KANI TO ATTAINED THE SUPREMO OF DMK PARTY BECAUSE SHE ONLY AFFECTED IN THE PERIOD,SUBSEQUENTLY, ONLY LADIES HEADED PARTY IS WIN BY THIS TIME IN TAMIL NADU,SO IT IS WELL FAVOUR OF KANI OTHER DMK LEADERS SHOULD BE INFORMED THROUGH THIS MAIL BE ALERT | |
| Posted by pershant kumar jha |
02/11/2011 12:41:56 |
| Bail prospects of DMK MP Kanimozhi and four other accused in the 2G spectrum allocation scam case today appeared to have brightened with the CBI not opposing their being freed by a Delhi court which has reserved its orders for November 3. Kanimozhi, Kalaignar TV MD Sharad Kumar, Directors of Kusegaon Fruits & Vegetables Asif Balwa, Rajiv Agarwal and Bollywood producer Karim Morani, today moved their bail plea in the wake of framing of charges against them in the case. The CBI, which did not oppose the plea of the five accused, however, chose to raise objections on the bail plea of Swan Telecom promoter Shahid Balwa and former telecom minister A Raja's former private secretary RK Chandolia, saying specific charges framed against them carry seven years jail term as maximum sentence. Giving reasons for not opposing the bail, Special public prosecutor UU Lalit said Kanimozhi and four others faced "specific" charges, apart from the "umbrella section" of 120-B (criminal conspiracy) IPC, which entail only five years sentence as maximum punishment. "Lets put Shahid Balwa and Chandolia in different category at this stage...I submit, one can make distinction so far as those for whom maximum punishment can be five years and those against whom maximum punishment can be seven years. "At this juncture, I am opposing the bail pleas of accused Chandolia and Shahid Balwa," Lalit told Special CBI Judge OP Saini. Regarding Kanimozhi and four others, Lalit said, "Of course, bail should be granted to them subject to discretion of the court which may impose certain conditions to ensure their presence during the hearings." On the charges framed against Kanimozhi and four others under section 409 (criminal breach of trust) of the IPC, which carries life term sentence as maximum punishment, Lalit said it was accompanied by the charge of criminal conspiracy as well. The CBI is categorising the five accused as distinct from Shahid Balwa and Chandolia on the basis of maximum sentence carried by the specific charges framed against them apart from the "umbrella section" of criminal conspiracy, Lalit said. He said the specific charges framed against Kanimozhi and four others, includes offences under provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, which carries five years as maximum sentence. "As a public prosecutor, this is my duty to see that the offences for which these accused (Kanimozhi and four others) are charged carries a maximum punishment of five years. We have no objection. We are not opposing their bail pleas. "I would humbly submit and request the court to consider the bail pleas of these five accused," Lalit said. He added, "I do not know how much time each accused has spent in custody but they have at least spent 5-6 months. This court might consider their bail pleas." The court would pronounce the order on all the seven bail pleas on November 3 after advocate Vijay Agarwal, appearing for Shahid Balwa and Chandolia, wrapped up his arguments on their bail pleas | |
| Posted by rkrajeshadv@gmail.com |
02/11/2011 08:54:47 |
| CBI - Central Government Brokers Investigation | |
| Posted by j.balaji |
01/11/2011 17:13:35 |
| yes,they have spent some time in the jail. | |
| Posted by ashok kumar singh |
31/10/2011 21:03:53 |
| no, the steps of CBI is very incorect. | |
| Posted by sulochana muthuchamy |
31/10/2011 20:05:05 |
| It is Hon'ble Judge's discretion. So CBI is correct. | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
31/10/2011 17:54:45 |
| yes, i do agree | |
| Posted by chitrarasu |
28/10/2011 14:24:43 |
| Because they are not unresponsiveness persons, | |
| Posted by vasant kulkarni |
28/10/2011 12:07:50 |
| THIS IS A CLEAR CASE OF POLITICAL INTEREFENCE.THE BAIL PLEAS REMAINED UNOPPOSED THE VERY NEXT DAY,WHEN HER FATHER VISITED THE IRON LADY IN DELHI. | |
| Posted by Arati Gawde |
27/10/2011 20:28:12 |
| NO | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
27/10/2011 10:07:32 |
| i do agree | |
| Posted by Adinath@Avinash Patil |
27/10/2011 09:41:34 |
| C B I MUST OPPOSE BAIL APPLICATION. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
27/10/2011 07:47:59 |
| Karunanithi corrected politically by influence. Since the charge is made what is the ground to release her on bail.? if she flew away from clutches of law what will the court do.? she May be a M.P. what about her passport, account other sources. | |
| Posted by VIJAYALAKSHMI SWARNA |
27/10/2011 05:58:15 |
| YES, CHARGE SHEET WAS FILED, SHE IS ENTITLE TO GET ENLARGE ON BAIL, THAT IS THE LAW OF LAND | |
| Posted by Fahim K. Bakshi Advocate |
26/10/2011 23:57:52 |
| Posted by Sanjeev |
26/10/2011 16:21:03 |
| Kanimozhi has spent considerable time in jail and any person unless proved guilty is innocent. Everyone has right to freedom. | |
| Posted by Dhingra P.S. |
26/10/2011 07:39:21 |
| Depends totally on the wisdom of the CBI as well as the position of the case and the quantum of influence exerted on the CBI by the political circles. | |
| Posted by Isaac Gabriel |
25/10/2011 23:01:58 |
| Once again it has been made clear that politicians are more powerful | |
| Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
25/10/2011 13:52:35 |
| if they satisfied with their evidence and records and no way to tampering further then it is right way | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
25/10/2011 12:49:54 |
| no | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
