Should 498 A of IPC (cruelty by husband or relatives of husband) be made non-cognizable and bailable. |
|
YES | 69 % |
NO | 28 % |
Can't Say | 3 % |
Total Votes Cast : 312 | |
Submitted By - Rajeev Kumar | Read Comments |
Posted by upananda purohit |
04/12/2011 08:21:56 |
though the section 498A IPC is an offence under IPC relating to marriage and some time it is misuse by the wife and their relation and the husband and their relarion suffering for the same without their fault, the chance of restoration become difficult due to rigour sufferance of in laws. So it should be bailable and cognizable offence to prevent the misuse and restoration of marriage by mediation. | |
Posted by rajesh vishwani |
24/11/2011 09:31:26 |
in view of false complaint. | |
Posted by Heaven 2011 |
23/11/2011 14:48:57 |
yes i feel that it should me made bailable. | |
Posted by AKHILESH SRIVASTAVA |
22/11/2011 13:26:46 |
No doubt,there are cases of misuse of 498A but in my opinion It must be continue as cognizable offence. Bail applications shall be dealt in the parameters laid down in the case of 'Amrawati' Vs. State of U.P. | |
Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
20/11/2011 17:47:39 |
yes. | |
Posted by M/s. Y-not legal services |
19/11/2011 12:38:51 |
Yes. Because mostly this section is misused by wives and police peoples. So its should be bailable.. | |
Posted by Nadeem Qureshi |
18/11/2011 16:45:24 |
if the case is non-cognizable and bailable then unneccesery burden of filing the cases upon the court will be. | |
Posted by S.RAJA SEKAR |
18/11/2011 12:07:37 |
daily news coming out regarding this is clear cut proof that its been mis used .. | |
Posted by Pranav S. Thakkar |
18/11/2011 12:00:38 |
Sec. 498A is part of The Law on Dowery. It is a personal issue of family, So, varification of complaint before taking cognigence by police is necessary to avoid false cases. | |
Posted by SUNIL KUMAR |
18/11/2011 11:13:41 |
The section is now being misused by many people by simply lodging a complaint without any reason/ | |
Posted by srkhan |
17/11/2011 01:01:29 |
these provisions must be non cognizable n bailable as in most of matrimonial matters comes to an end with compromise.After filing of such cases if in -laws faces sever difficulties the matter results in compromise with divorce,however if in laws gets lesser difficulties the matter sometimes c0mpromises amicably n parties may resume cohabitation. | |
Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
16/11/2011 22:55:26 |
Let Apex Court give quietus to this issue | |
Posted by A. A. JOSE |
16/11/2011 16:31:19 |
Even inspite of the rigid provisions existing in S.498A of IPC,cases of cruelty and harassment to wivesby the Husband and in-laws are increasing on alarming rate. Therefore, I do not think that the provisions need any review to make them lighter for those who are ill-treating their wives and throwing them out from their matrimonial homes. | |
Posted by Vijay Kumar |
16/11/2011 12:28:21 |
Its should be non-cognizable and bailable, because maximum cases were found false, but in case if cruelty goes to death of concern or serious hospitalization, need to check the present fact and apply. | |
Posted by Ankit Kr Mishra |
16/11/2011 10:06:40 |
it should be left open to the discreation of Judges. Based on cases. | |
Posted by V R SHROFF |
14/11/2011 21:17:16 |
it is family matter, no one going to run away leaving his entire family , home, job. Let court decide cruelty or not!!, Why Arrest & all drama It must be noncong & bailable : Only if criminal sec say used hot knife> bleeding injury, then yes, but in all normal 498a, it must be bailable | |
Posted by rajiv_lodha |
12/11/2011 18:37:17 |
It must be a non biased law. Many genuine cases of dowry cases get sidelined by the 498a misusers. Many families suffere ir-repairable damage when DIL drags the in laws in police with false allegations. 498a shud be bailable at least, so that innocent ppl do not lose their self respect & chances of reconciliation are left behind. The false allegations shud be dealt with iron hand. | |
Posted by Nadeem Qureshi |
12/11/2011 12:12:24 |
only bailable not non-cognizable | |
Posted by Sanjeev |
11/11/2011 19:41:56 |
Yes this should be made bailable offence as that would save innocent husband and family members from loss of respect due to arrest. These cases settle either in aquittal or settlement but the loss of respect due to arrest is not made up. | |
Posted by Nadeem Qureshi |
11/11/2011 13:44:29 |
not non-cognizable but bailable | |
Posted by saya |
10/11/2011 20:36:44 |
That will make the husbands more cruel as for their crimes, there is no quick punishment. They are already misusing the divorce laws by filing the divorces and remarrying during the divorce procedure since it becomes difficult for wife to prove his second marriage. | |
Posted by Arvind Singh Chauhan |
10/11/2011 20:01:49 |
In my opinion, it should be made cognizable but bailable. | |
Posted by Agneepath |
10/11/2011 12:47:33 |
This is the most misused law of the country, and still government is sleeping. It's high time something is done for it. | |
Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
09/11/2011 18:37:43 |
i do agreed | |
Posted by Shailesh Kumar Shah |
09/11/2011 18:22:44 |
I feel amendment in this section needed. | |
Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
09/11/2011 14:35:07 |
yes some time the false complaint may punish innocent too. | |
Posted by Dhingra P.S. |
09/11/2011 13:30:04 |
YES, it must be non-cognizable and bailable, as the accused is forced to be made totally handicapped to defend himself by the police, besides causing total bankruptsy and loss of mental peace and social image for all the relatives and friends of the accused, even if he is exonerated at the end. For them everything is lost forever and life becomes a burden thereafter. | |
Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
09/11/2011 11:24:28 |
What about genuine cases? Even 498a is insufficient. My terrible experience with my daughter's husband requires more stringent laws. | |
Posted by mohammed qadeer.M |
09/11/2011 10:03:43 |
Sec 498A, the law was implemented to safeguard the women and the same may be used for her welfare and to give her a happy married life....it is true too good is too bad the same thing happened in this context more power granted in favor of women has lead to misuse of the provision and it needs to be amended to stop the misuse.... | |
Posted by Anwesha Saha |
08/11/2011 21:46:21 |
The provision of sec 498A of IPC is being misused by the women horribly. Old in-laws are harrased when they are not even guilty of the act anyway.If the husband, in-laws and relatives are guilty of act "cruelty", then proper investigation followed by punishment as stated in the provision of IPC is acceptable, but at first instance it should be made NON-COGNIZABLE and BAILABLE. | |
Posted by sureshkumar g r |
08/11/2011 21:13:26 |
Cruelty by husband or relative of husband should be to be decided by the court, most of the women folk and her family members are misusing in collusion with the police thereby resulting in hardships to husband and relatives of husband. Hence cruelty by husband or relatives of husband should me made non-cognizable and bailable. | |
Posted by Kiran Kumar |
08/11/2011 20:01:28 |
this provision has come out to be a horrible law...it needs a big change so that it is not misused by anyone. | |
Posted by B. Deb |
08/11/2011 17:45:41 |
Sec.498A of IPC is an instrument for the women who are in extortion business and carry on their activities accordingly..... This particular section is being used for blackmailing the husband and his relatives to bow down to the demands of the wife.... and Section 498A is legally supporting those women who have married for easy money and the same is been legalised in our country through section 498a. Women earns a heavy amount and help her unregistered hubby..... This section has been particularly used by the hungry women who is not satisfied with one man and so its a wonderful intruments for extortion and blackmailing to be legal.... finally, sec.498A had created a great unrest in the society and legalised the oldest profession of this world.... | |