Vodafone case: PIL claims conflict of interest by CJI - Should the CJI recused from hearing the case as contended? |
|
Yes | 72 % |
No | 21 % |
Cant Say | 8 % |
Total Votes Cast : 53 | |
Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
Posted by A. Patrawala Advocate |
03/03/2012 21:07:35 |
Though India being the socialist republic, the said verdict is purely wedded to capitalist philosophy. Wrongful gain to Vodafone and wrongful loss to poor country's public exchquer of Rs.11,000 cr.with Rs. 2500 cr. interest thereon. No advocate on earth can “destroy reputations and demolish institutions” except the judges themselves.Slamming Rs. 50,000 fine is an act of judicial Hitlerianism and amounts to the contempt of court. Bar Council of India must take up the case of the the Advocate as he is the officer of the court. | |
Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
29/02/2012 15:40:35 |
. | |
Posted by Kirti Kar Tripathi |
28/02/2012 21:35:56 |
yes | |
Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
28/02/2012 12:25:06 |
. | |
Posted by rajesh vishwani |
28/02/2012 09:09:22 |
f | |
Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
27/02/2012 12:01:29 |
i do accept. | |
Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
27/02/2012 09:11:43 |
yes. | |
Posted by Vinod U Bohra |
24/02/2012 17:08:57 |
good | |