Should courts interfere in the nomination of Sachin Tendulkar as Rajya Sabha member? |
|
| Yes | 37 % |
 |
|
| No | 60 % |
|
|
|
| Cant Say | 3 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 227 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by aditya vadali |
23/07/2012 14:57:33 |
| no need, it is waste of the precious time of the Hon'ble Court. | |
| Posted by Jayanta Kumar Sarkar |
30/05/2012 15:06:00 |
| In my openion, rather, there should be debate on abrogation of nomination facility since government is spending huge public money on them, who don't have political interest/inclination nor they can participate in the law making. Thanks jayanta sarkar | |
| Posted by Deep Narayan |
29/05/2012 16:29:10 |
| anyone can be a member of parliament if he get nominated by president of India | |
| Posted by Bhaskar Shankar |
28/05/2012 22:20:33 |
| court cannot interfere in the nomination of sachin as rajya sabha member. | |
| Posted by Tribhuwan Singh |
28/05/2012 16:39:36 |
| Sachin is a cricket brand his experts in cricket not in civil work.If really congress want to take a cricketer in Rajya Sabha, please call Sunil Gawashkar, | |
| Posted by Kranti |
26/05/2012 17:53:32 |
| Y should sachin be nominated as RS memeber .He can serve to the public without being a RS member if he want.!!!!!!!!1 | |
| Posted by M N Shaikh |
25/05/2012 13:03:08 |
| Is there any player in the world having 100 centuries except sachin. Answer is no. Perhaps controvercy is motivated by politics but our Sachin should not be dragged into such a unhealthy debate & controvercy. | |
| Posted by M N Shaikh |
23/05/2012 13:06:59 |
| Judiciary acts within its boundaries and let the legislature to do its own work, when constitution has already empowered them for the same.When Sachin`s achievements are rewarded by nation in such manner then nothing just for intereference therein. | |
| Posted by sureshkumar g r |
20/05/2012 15:28:05 |
| Absolutely no, Also the question itself dosnt arise because he has been nominated by the President of India under eminent personalities quota and hence the question of interference of the Courts dosnt arise at all. | |
| Posted by Roopsi |
20/05/2012 14:41:17 |
| Posted by sanjay |
17/05/2012 14:43:53 |
| There are so many experts who can give valuable thinktank for Indian legislation, they are not getting nominated and person like sachin who is professional in cricket and only money earner, selfish is getting nominated. this is worth condemned. Why dont you nominate persons like anna hajare, kiran bedi, arvindbhai etc. | |
| Posted by Navneet Kulshreshtha |
14/05/2012 18:02:20 |
| BECAUSE SACHIN IS A GREAT PERSON.... | |
| Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
14/05/2012 12:37:18 |
| no need | |
| Posted by Parveen Kr. Aggarwal |
12/05/2012 14:53:23 |
| In case the Court interferes in the nomination, it can only be said to be overreach on the part of the Court. The scheme of the constitution does not contemplate interference of Courts into affairs of Parliament. | |
| Posted by Bosco Fizardo |
09/05/2012 17:25:23 |
| it should be the individual decision. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
08/05/2012 08:10:11 |
| the validity of appointment is exclusively rests with the president and the removal and dismissal is rest with rajya sabha speaker. ex officio chairman and resolution of members of committee. | |
| Posted by Sridhar |
04/05/2012 22:12:01 |
| What has Sachin done to the Public? He played for the nation & he got paid well for the same. Did he spare for the public?? Did he retire & made way for others to come in?? There would me more & more sachins in the nation, not everybody has the luck to get in... Padmashri for Sachin will lose its honour if given to people like this... | |
| Posted by Heaven 2011 |
04/05/2012 13:17:15 |
| No..the court should not. | |
| Posted by R.K Nanda |
03/05/2012 13:32:27 |
| No. R.K.NANDA-ADVOCATE | |
| Posted by Ravinder Kaushik |
03/05/2012 11:48:03 |
| hi | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
03/05/2012 09:44:13 |
| i dont agree with | |
| Posted by pradip shah |
03/05/2012 08:21:40 |
| no way. | |
| Posted by MohammedRaffiq Bijapur |
02/05/2012 21:18:01 |
| Judiciary need not to interfere in parliamentary affairs. Constitution allows such nomination. | |
| Posted by Dhingra P.S. |
02/05/2012 18:44:11 |
| Please read the word "courts" in place of "SC" in my last post. | |
| Posted by Dhingra P.S. |
02/05/2012 18:41:53 |
| Interference by SC in the election process without any sort of irregularity noticed in the process of nomination can merely be a case of interruption in democratic electioneering process and against the Constitutional provisions. | |
| Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
02/05/2012 11:27:31 |
| it is his liberty | |
| Posted by Ravinder Kaushik |
02/05/2012 10:58:03 |
| I believe it is right. | |
| Posted by Soumya Dutta |
01/05/2012 21:45:05 |
| It is not the function of the Court. Court should be more concerned about judiciary | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
