Specialization in Cases involving Economic Offenses-Customs Act-FEMA .- involving the Special Police Establishment of the the Central Bureau of Investigation [CBI]

Consumer Protection Cases.

Writ jurisdiction -High Court

Area of practice;

Consumer Protection Act-Labour &industrial Law
Arbitration Act
Civil & Constitutional law
Customs Act
Negotiable Instruments Act
Banking and Commercial Law .
FEMA

Handled matters in the High Court,Civil Courts ,Tribunals and the Supreme Court of India.

Litigation reference:

Decision of the Full Bench of the Madras High Court in W.P. No.15011 of 2001 reported in https://www.rishabhdara.com/sc/view.php?case=72177 .Matter involved s the constitutionality of the Governmental action in providing rural reservation for admission to professional courses conducted by the Government and self-financing colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu.

Decision of the Madras High Court in Balmer Lawrie & Co.Ltd vs A.Jayachandra Reddy on 12 January, 2009 reported in https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/522041/-Matter in Issue -Indian Stamp act & Registration Act.

The landmark decision of Mr Justice M.Srinivasan High Court ,Madras later elevated to the Supreme Court of India reported in AIR 1994 Mad 112, 1994 (73) ELT 804 Mad later on affirmed by the Division Bench in AIR 1993 Mad 336, 1993 (42) ECC 183, (1993) IMLJ 569 .

Assisted the High Court on the question of Applicability of Customs Notification 64/88 from the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Mediwell Hospital & Health Care ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 December, 1996 reported in (1997) 1 SCC 759 : JT 1997 (1) SC 270.

Involved in the litigation against Santhimadam Plantations & Agro Products Ltd., SEBI I before the Securities Appellate Tribunal,Mumbai- ended in favour of the Company of the Tribunal consisting of Justice Kumar Rajaratnam, Presiding Officer. Decision reported in 2006 69 SCL 64 SAT - https://www.sebi.gov.in/satorders/santhi.html

Represented the Firm in the decision rendered by Her Lordship Ms Justice Banumathi in the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Urban Land Ceiling Act in the matter of imp-leaded Respondent Mr Stanley Deaver.

Represented the Firm in the reported decision of the High Court in K. Rajeswara Rao vs P.Sunitha Rep.By on 18 June, 2009 reported in https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/883187/