The Flaw In The Law- Is it time to concur?

The Flaw in the Law- part 27

Justice Prevails at last:

The draft of  The Land Titling Bill, 2010(Government of India) specifies:

CHAPTER – VIII

COMPULSORY INTIMATION TO THE LAND TITLING AUTHORITY

52. Compulsory intimation of land acquisition proceedings

It will be incumbent upon the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to intimate to the Authority, in the manner as may be prescribed, the fact of issue of a notification under section 4, sub-section 1 or a declaration under section 6, or passing of an award under section 15 of that Act in respect of any immovable property situated within the notified area and to obtain a certificate of its recording. 

53. Compulsory intimation of Government transactions

All the transactions by the Government in respect of immovable properties within the notified area, including alienation, assignment, regularization of occupation, sale, grant or lease, shall be intimated to the Authority by the authorized official carrying out such transaction, in the manner as may be prescribed, and it shall be incumbent upon such official to obtain the certificate of recording.

 That  makes  notification u/s  4(1), declaration u/s 6 and award u/s 15 of the LA Act, 1894 are all compulsorily registrable.

Is it  right to say now that the flaw referred to in my presentation titled "The flaw in the law" is a flaw in deed?

End of part 27