1.In an appeal against conviction u/s 138 NIA, in ADJ Court the accused files an application giving wrong facts? Does it constitute a contempt? If not what action can be taken?? 2. In an appeal against conviction u/s 138 NIA, the case is reserved for orders. The accused files an application for one opportunity for argument. The court gives a date for argument. Instead of arguing the accused files an application for filing additional documents. Was it not the duty of the court not to accept his application for addl documents and insist the appellant to argue for which the case was posted. The appellant has already been given 30 dates! This kind of proceedings betray the confidence of victim, the complainant. What is the remedy if the court itself does not insist upon the appellant to argue and keeps on giving date after date? 3. If the respondent/complainant files an application with the Court reminding the court to exercise the discretion vested with it by law and conduct the proceedings instead of giving date after date, does it amount to contempt??
