Mr. Ajay,
Where is the need of observing all that as suggested by Mr. Kumar Doab through his long posts just to make you confused?
Simple solution to your problem is that since you have already rendered service more than 4 years and 240 days, you are eligible for gratuity meant for service of 5 years, as your period of service of 4 years, 11 months is qualified for payment of gratuity.
As usual in several other cases also, with his multiple posts, Mr. Kumar Doab has created utter confusion to make your problem much more complicated than providing any specific solution.
In other words, besides creating complication in your problem by misdirecting you with his wrong advice, he has tended merely to waste your time and energy by unnecessarily loading you with quite irrelevant junk material.
God knows with what of his hidden intention he has tried to misguide you towards a very wrong direction.
EVEN OTHERWISE ALSO, you cannot expect any legitimate advice from a person, who always appears with a fake identity, as he has not shown his real name, photo and location in his profile. HE ALWAYS APPEARS WITH HIS FAKE IDENTITY, NEVER COMES FORWARD WITH HIS REAL NAME, PHOTO AND LOCATION PLACE. He has very openly refused to come forward with his real identity (name, photo and place of his location) at his LCI profile, even on several repeated requests.
EVEN on your specific advice to reveal his identity, he won’t oblige you to reveal his REAL NAME, PHOTO AND PLACE OF LOCATION. FOR EXPERIMENT SAKE, YOU MAY LIKE TO TRY your luck. I AM SURE, HE WON'T do that.
If an expert, he should not have felt the need to hide himself. Probability of a person hiding himself can be with the following reasons:
- Either he can be a criminal; OR
- A fraud; OR
- Cannot be an expert, but only be acting as a tout of some lawyers on commission basis to first to confuse the person struggling with a problem by making his problem more and more complicated, then recommending him about any one of the lawyer for whom he may be working.
You may like to see some examples, where Mr. Kumar Doab tried to make the problems complicated by side-tracking the issues to quite a different directions.
For example Mr. Kumar Doab confused the authors of a problem pertaining to "wife's share to property" but loaded with his HUNDREDS OF PAGES of google searched irrelevant junk material consisting of amendment of Goa Educational Rules and an Act of succession after death of the owner, while the person was still alive. You may like to see that by opening the link: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Wife-s-right-to-share-in-property-in-Goa--626526.asp
A question arises, when the problem did not have even a remote concern with education in Goa, for what purpose that link was provided?
Another example can be seen in the problem of the author concerned with “purchased property without sale deed”, but Mr. Kumar Doab gave the colour of adverse possession due to that even the experts could get misled and concentrated their advice about adverse possession of the property. The same can be seen at the link: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Notary-land-documents-625956.asp
There are several such type of examples where he used to misguide the members with his wrong advice.
