If Respondent raises new facts in his defense (There is no explicit counter-claim or set-off........its a pure negating defense) in addition to replying to facts listed in plaint.
And if Plaintiff fails to respond and finally does not respond back .............. any via replication / rejoinder until .................... and even after the framing of issues ...... ......................... Does that procedurally mean/imply that plaintiff did not deny the existence and admitted to those new facts raised by respondent?
Please also give a SC and Bombay HC citation if any...Thanks