SIR,CO
IN MY SECOND APPEAL I HAD SOUGHT DIRECTION FROM THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER THAT MY ORGANISATION, SBI, BE DIRECTED TO GIVE ME CERTIFIED COPIES OF RULES OF SBI UNDER WHICH THEY HAD WITHELD ILLEGALLY MY PF DUES ON RETIREMENT, PUT UNJUSTFIED LIENS ON MY PF DUES, RETAINED MY DUES ETC WITH HOSTLE INTENT.
IN A DECISION PASSED VIDE VIDEOCONFERENCING THE CHIEF INFO COMMISSIONER DIRECTED SBI TO PRODUCE FILES BUT DID NOT DIRECT THEM TO ADDUCE REASONS FOR THEIR ACTS, WHICH WERE IN VIOLAT ION OF RULES OF THE BANK AND WHICH I ENTTILED TO BEING THE 'AFFECTED PERSON UNDER SEC 4 (1) d OF THE RTI ACT.
THE PERTINENT POINT IS I WANTED TO EXPOSE SBI WHO IN HOSTILE MANNER TROUBLED ME BY VIOLATION OF RULES FOR BLANTANT ILLEGAL ACTS WHICH WERE ALSO IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF THE BANK.
SIR MY QUERY IS
IF THE CIC REFUSES TO DIRECT THE CPIO TO ADDUCE REASONS FOR THEIR ACTS BUT ONLY INSTRUCTS THEM TO SHOW FILES AND GIVE COPIES TO ME , WHAT RECOURSE DO I HAVE?
I NEED REASONS FOR THEIR ILLEGAL ACTS AND NOT COPIES OF DOCUMENTS IN EVIDENCE OF THEIR ACTIONS.
KINDLY ADVISE
VINAY KALA
MAY 8,10
