Judgement oncase underipc 306 (women inciting men to suicide

Judge is not supposed to decide the issue of registering criminal complaint on the basis of any case law or previous judgment of any High Court but on the basis of the facts and circumstance of the present case before him The evidence that shows that the accused instigated the victim to commit has to be seen, whether the accused was the wife and victim husband that fact is not relevant. Get sensible lawyer to argue the case properly and get the relevant order rather searching for the case law that will not be of no use in any circumstance.

Lawyers and judges asking litigants to brig judgments is not something that is unheard off..

As already suggested to you previously in your threads asking, provoking , pushing a citizen to commit suicide is not lawful…

Approach a very able LOCAL counsel of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in criminal matters, having successful track record…………and worth his/her salt… 

If your current lawyer is unable to handle despite facts/evidences/inputs provided by you, change your lawyer..

Dear client what's your lawyer doing if he not capable to search that kind of Judgment then you should engage a senior lawyer anyways you may approach us I will elaborate properly about your case.
Advocate Anurag Bhatt
Allahabad High Court
Mobile 9198889990

In the light of the above rival submissions, now let us have a view on the charge sheet materials. The complaint came to be lodged by father of the deceased on 14.06.2014 at 10.00 a.m. and the case was registered against accused, her father and her sister. However, after investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner only. Two days after registration of the complaint, further statement of the complainant is recorded on 17.06.2014, wherein he stated that he got opened the laptop of the deceased on 15.06.2014 through a technician, found the death note attributing the responsibility of the suicide against the wife and in-laws. Said laptop is seized under mahazar and forensic report is collected in this regard. The complainant witnesses cited for the prosecution witnesses are CW1-Complainant, CW2-wife of CW1, CW3- son of the complainant, CW4-brother of the complainant and CW5- P. Suresh, son of Shankaranaryana Hande. No separate statement of CW5 under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. is recorded; though he claims to have personal knowledge of the dispute between the spouse, he is a mahazar witness.