No locus standi - need explanation

dear friend, any one affected by the stage carriage permit for a particular route has a locus standi.

general public can always raise an objection, and when there is a gross violation of law and state pollicy then any resident of state can raise objection.

route curtailment and route overlapping can often be seen in transport business, actually this all is politically affected process, but u ve locus standi to challenge it.

Dear Kiran Kumar,

Thankyou verymuch for your reply. I need more clarification in this regard. If any High Court or Supreme Court made any judgements ? Because I worked as a labour and made the objection on public intrest basis. But the Madras High Court made a judgement that the labour has no local standi to make objection for a stage carraige permit. In this circumtance, my objection sofar not disposed by RTA . So I need more clarification in this regard and what manner or grounds it stands.... Is it actually my objection fall under the category of "No Locus Standi " ?

Please help me in this regard. Thanks in Advance. If you need more details I will send the all reference particulars to you through e-mail.

Surprise.... 30,000 members........ but no  reply for my Q ?

****

Naresha

*****

DEAR NARESH

DON'T  BLAIM  LEARNED  MEMBERS YOU CAN SEARCH ON SUPREME COURT WEB SIGHT/JUDGMENT OR ANY HIGH COURT.

Hellow

Adinath@Avinash Patil... I am sorry.... I am not blaming any members and I know the members loyal. If anybody feels my comment is irretating, I am sorry.

Naresha

TAKE IT SPORTIVE WAY

mr naresh please note that as a labour, you do not have any lucas standi; but as a consumer of the said service; you have a locus standi; as a general public you and like you - everyone has the lucas standi to raise the point before the court. very particularly where public money is involved. you should tell the hc, that not as a lobour, but as a general public you and as a consumer you appearing there, and public interest is also involved.  therefore you have the lucas standi. if necessary, request court to convert the case as pil - where instead of lucas standi public interest will be seen; but for pil it will also be seen that you do not have any personal interest or benifit involved there - it is the condition of pil.pil is a writ under art 226 at hc and u/a 32 at sc.

for further clarification, post some more and relevant details - in short

Dear Arup Kumar Guptha.,

Thank you verymuch for your reply.

I need one help from you that is I need the following Karnataka High Court judgment for my case purpose.

Karnataka High Court Writ Petitions Nos. 23697 to 23701/1992 decided on 18th Nov. 1992

I need above said judgment for reference. I already search in web side as well as karnataka High Court web site. But I con't get the same.

Please help me in this regard and inform me the same to me and if you find the same, just mail me as attachment file to my mail id : naresha_1999@yahoo.com

Thanks in Advance.

Naresha

it is 25 page, therefore not posted. searsc the bellow links on google. you will get it. i collected a copy, if you do not get send me pm, i shall send it.

https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/758642/

please read 'search' instead of 'searsc'

Hi friends Please read my post. I already have the mentioned Judgment copy of Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Sri. Pauli Govis And Another Etc.. But my requirement is not this one.

Anyway thanks for your reply. Thanks a lot.

Naresha