DEAR,
I HAVE A PROPERTY IN WHICH 4 PARTIES(A,B,C,D) ARE INVOLVED.
PROPERTY IS SITUTATED IN A's BUILDING PREMISES
TWO SUITS ARE FILED IN CIVIL COURT
1) A Vs B
2) C Vs B
X) RESTORATION CASE D Vs C ( HEARING IS ON .CASE IS NOT ENTERTAIN)
NOW IN ALL 2 CASES STATUS QUO IS MAINTAINED AS PER COURT
NOW DUE TO RAIN BOUNDARY WALL WITH TEEN SHED IS COLLAPSED AND WHEN 'A' TRIES TO ERECT IT AGAIN 'C' PRESENTED ITS STAY ORDER IN KOTWALI AND WORK IS STOPPED BY POLICE FOR MAINTAINING ORDER
MY QUESTION IS
'A' IS NOT A PARTY IN *(C Vs B) CASE..SO CAN THIS DECISION APPLIES TO 'A' OR NOT?
WHAT CAN POLICE DO IF PARTY ERECT HIS WALL ..WHAT TYPE OF CASE?
CONTEMPT OF COURT IS APPLICABLE WHEN 'A' IS NOT A PARTY IN THAT CASE?
