RESPECTABLE CLUB MEMEBRS, SEEKING CLARIFICATION FOR THE FOLLOWING. IN CHQ BOUNCE CASE
1) VAKKALATHU NAMA- SIGNED BY THE COMPLAINTANT IN THE YEAR 2006-COUNCIL ACCORDINGLY
APPEARING IN THE COURT SINCE FROM 2006 TO 2015. AT THE FILLING STAGE ONLY ONE TIME COMPLAINTANT APPEARED IN THE YEAR 2006. AFTER THAT COMPLAINTANT EXPIRED IN THE YEAR
2011. BUT THEIR COUNCIL DECLARED THE COURT IN THE YEAR JAN2015 AT THE SAME TIME ASKING
SUBSTITUTION OF HER DAUGHTER( COMPLAINTANT HAVING WIFE AND TWO DAUGHTER) ONLY ONE DAUGHTER FILLING THROUGH SAME ADVOGATE AS SHE IS THE ONE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE FATHER COMPANY. FATHER EXPIRED IN THE YEAR 2011 NOW I WANT TO RUN THE CASE AS THE ONE OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE FATHER CO.
2) HERE CHQ ISSUED TO COMPLAINTANT ON INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BY ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL...
NO COMPANY INVOLVED IN THIS TRANSACTION. THEIR FATHER ALIVE THE SAME ADVOCATE ALSO
REPLIED ON INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY. NOW MAGISTRATE ALLOWED IN THE ANGLE SHE IS THE DAUGHTER...
MY DOUBT
3) VAKKALATHU NAMA WHETHER VALID EVEN AFTER DEATH OF COMPLAINT IN THE YEAR 2011.
TO 2015.
4) IF OK NO PROBLEM OR OTHERWISE HOW CAN WE INFIRM MAGISTRATE COURT ANY JUDGEMENT OR ANY SPECIFIC LAW AND RULES AVILABLE FOR CRIMINAL CASE .
5) ALL TRANSACTION ON INDIVIDUAL BASIS.. HOW AS A DIRECTOR OF FATHER CO SHE CAN INVOLVE TO CONDUCT THE CASE. IF ON INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ALSO REMAINING LEGAL HARIER TO BE AUTHORIED..IT IS CORRECT OR NOT... IN FATHER COMPLAINT IN THE COURT ALSO AT THE TIME OF FILLING IN THE YEAR 2006 NO DETAILS NOTHING ABOUT THEIR COMPANY....
KINDLY SUGGEST AND MEMBERS PLEASE QTE ANY REFERENCE AND SUGGESTION....THANKS.
