138 NIA-Summoning Document in a Revision against Cognizance
In a 138 NIA the complainant files the complaint stating that there was an agreement between him and the accused for the amount advanced. Complainant does not attach the said agreement or even a copy of the said agreement. (In fact there is no such agreement)
Is the cognizance taken by the trial court legally correct?
Can such a cognizance be challenged for want of proper enquiry and complete reading and application of mind, by the magistrate before taking cognizance?
Does Revisional Court have power to summon the so called agreement?