Sub-rule(1) of Rule 1 in Order 40 of  the C.P.C.provides that "Wher it appears to the Court to be just and convenient, the Court may by order-

                            a) appoint a receiver of any property.............."

          The term 'just and convenient'does not mean the arbitrary whim or pleasure of the Court to pass an order for appointment on any ground which stands against the equity. Appointment of receiver deprives a person from enjoyment of that property during the tenure of receivership. Therefore, it has been regarded as a 'harsh remedy'. 'Just and convenient' connotes what is right and just according to the judicial notion. Order for appointment of receiver should be for the protection or prevention of injury according to legal norms.