Ritesh Sharma (Advocate) 11 May 2016
Dr Katta Venkata Rama Krishna (Retd Sr Director Govt of India/ Advocate) 11 May 2016
1) If a telephonic conversation was unilaterally recorded by one of its participant without obtaining the consent of the other, it is possible that the non-consenting party/parties could claim that their right to privacy was violated.
2) the Right to Privacy has been recognised under both law and self-regulatory mechanisms including:
3) Due to this, any surreptitious, non-consensual recording of a telephonic conversation may have implications relating to privacy.
4) Rest -- a voice recording or a call recording may now be termed as “electronic records” and their admissibility in evidence is now governed by Section 65-A and Section 65-B of the Evidence Act.