LAWyersclubindia LCI
Login  Register
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More




Amit Pateria's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 34

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    All question pertaining to the Constitutional Law, Civil & Cyber Laws can be asked. Question related to the violation of Human Rights and Service Matters may also be asked.

    My area of expertise
    Constitutional Lawl & Cyber Laws

    My experience in the area (years):
    Practicing lawyer at the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in depth knowledge and experience of Client Consultancy as well as of handling Litigation/s of varied nature.

    Organizations I belong to:
    Privet Practitioner (Advocate/ Lawyer).

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    not yet.

    Educational credentials:
    LLB from Pune University, Diplomas in Corporate Laws, Cyber Laws, Intellectual Property Laws, Alternate Dispute Resolution System, Human Rights and Labor Laws.

    Award & Honors:
    Ex-Consultant National Human Rights Commission (law Division), New Delhi.

  • Raymond Fernandes says : Review Petition
    Hi Friends, Sub: Redevelopment composite development scheme under NOC of MHADA DC Regulation 33 (7). This is a matter of allotment of flat under redevelopment scheme which was already alloted to some other tenant & she sold it to builder in 2006 & the same flat he alloted to my father in the year 2009. The builder called my father to come with necessary documents and to execute the agreement. My father approached him on his call, He said to first inspect the flat if my father founds some defects then he will renovate and then he will execute the agreemen of the flat. When my father pointed out some defects in the flad the builder refused to cure it becoz he wanted to demolish the chawl (cessed building) and wanted to hand over to BMC & MHADA for road widening to grant him OC. On his refusal of curing the defects my father appointed an advocate with the xerox (draft) copy of agreement of 2009 and filed a Short Cause suit at Bombay City Civil Court in the year 2010. But my advocate while drafting the plaint wrongly mentioned that the agreement was executed with the plaint & builder in the year 2009. In the month August my advocate applied an Notice Of Motion seeking injunction order restraining the defendants to disposses me from the said transit accomodation until the filnal hearing, bcoz while the suit was pending the builder approached MHADA to give me a notice to vacate within 7 days u/s 95 A of MHADA act. we failed to get any relief from city civil. In the month of June 2011 my father filed an Writ Petition at Bombay High Court (division bench)challenging Mhada 95 A and also i came to know from RTI act 2005 documents which i got form BMC (building & proposal dept), Resident Executive Engineer Office (MBBR) board MHADA. in that my father allotment was showing in a newly constructing tower which is still under construction. However this month in the devision bench the writ petition Original side was rejected while admission on grounds pointed out by builder advocates that my father as stated in SC suit city civil plaint in 2010, that the agreement as been executed & we have accepted. but the fact is we never accepted the flat but the local police and the MHADA officer evicted forcefully in the flat which offered by the developer last year in November 2010? Now i really dont understand what to do? please guide me? I had a suit filed in City Civil Court last year 2010. In the plaint my advocate had by draft error had written that an agreement as been executed with the developer & plaintiff

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799

view more ..