Kirti Kar Tripathi's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 3473

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

sanjay kumar says : 506(ii) case pendng against me

ravinder jeet says : urgent help
sir, i wanna meet you in person can you give me your address and contact number please sir we are in great trouble its all about my whole life if any case will registered then my whole life will be ruined plz sir help...........

Member (Account Deleted) says : will u help me in divorce related problems
will u help me in divorce related problems

Sachin says : PLSSS SIR HELP ME OUT
HELLO SIR, IT'S SACHIN HERE I WANT TO ASK A CASE OF MY FAMILY WHERE FIVE MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY RESOLVED THE MATTER OF OUR BUSINESS WHERE MY FATHERS'S ARE 4 BROTHER. TWO ARE IN ONE SIDE AND OTHER TWO IN ANOTHER WHERE TWO BROTHERS HAD 2 FLATS ON RESOLUTION BOTH OF THEM ACCEPTED TO DIVIDE THE THE TWO FLATS AMONGST TWO BROTHER EACH IN EACH CASE AND THEY SIGNED A SIMPLE PAPER CONDITIONS WHICH WERE FRAMED BY OUR FIVE FAMILY MEMBERS. SO I WANT TO ASK THAT IF THEY DENY TO GIVE THE SAME CAN WE SUE THEM ALSO.THE FLAT IS ON MY DAD'S BRO NAME. IS IT POSSIBLE TO GET THE SAME ?

sandip says : sir need help
sir i am final year student of law and no experience of preparing moot court. sir please help me for preparing the below moot problem. On january 1, 2005 one ramesh while he was travelling from bangalore to pune by chennamma express was detained at belgaum railway station by the railway police and a suitcase containing a sum of rs. 5,00,000/- was seized from him on the suspicion case under section 411 ipc read with sections 41 and 102 of the cr.p.c was registered against him. Meanwhile intimation about the seizure of money was sent to the incomce tax authorities at belgaum on 2nd january 2005. On 4th january 2005, the income tax inspector belgaum sent an information to the commissioner, income tax department, belgaum about the fact of possession of aforesaid amount by ramesh and also that he did not have any papers and document regarding the ownership and possession of the amount. the commissioner issued a warrant of authorization under section 132a of the income tax act, 1961 on the basis of which the income tax officer sent a letter of requisition to the station officer incharge, railway police belgaum requiring the station house officer to hand over the seized sum of money to him(incom tax officer) who had been aouthrized by warrant of authorization to receive it. Meanwhile the railway police after completing the investigation submitted the final report on 15th january, 2005 wherein it was stated that the money found in the possession of ramesh did not represent stolen property or property acquired from any offence. Ramesh moved an application before the railway magistrate, belgaum praying that the money which had been recovered from his possession, be returned to him as it was not required for the purpose of any enquiry or trial. he further relied upon the fact that the railway police had given a final report in his favour. In these facts and circumstances, argue on the application filed by shri ramesh on behalf of the applicatn as well as on behafl of the income tax department. please rply me on my email id patilsandip975@gmail.com

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799