RAKHI BUDHIRAJA ADVOCATE's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 1121

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Raj says :
I am a partner in a partnership firm registered in mumbai, now i want to retire from the firm. What is the procedure guide me step by step so that i could submit the required documents to retire. Please note the firm is partnership at will. Do i have to make a whole new deed or just a supplement.

amrik.mehra says : help
I got married in the year 2003.In the year march'2009 my wife has given a complaint to amritsar police to register a FIR against me under section 498a, 406. However police has given us a clean chit to us. Registered copy is available withus. Now my wife has moved into court and court has summoned us under section 498a and 406. She is asking for maintainence. please advice and guide.my email id is mehra73@yahoo.com

R.prasath says : Sec.of 6 TP Act
please send any citation regarding Section 6 of TP Act. "whether life interest can be alienated"

chitresh says : srfaesia
i am having account in bank of india. bank had debited the 11043/-(10-4-2007) for insurance premium but they purchased the policy of 8878/- they take refund of the money from insurance company after 2 yrs of rs 2370/-(3-3-2009).while a theft took place on 31-1-2008. and i had informed the bank same day with all the documents ( i had reciving also ) . they didnt launched the claim . while i had a loss of 700000/-.when i bring this matter with headoffice/zonal manager of the bank .they just refund the premium diffrence.and didnt concerened about my loss .the issued me a notice demanding 23 lakh rs under surfaci act (santioned limit was 30 lakh) on 2nd may 2009. ihad deposited 7 lakh to bank after the notice . now i had to pay 16 lakh to the bank . the account was being N P A (due to non renewal ). bank was never intresed in insurance claim. the access amount diffrence was noticed by us. while we had other policy also regarding which is valid that time and bank is also familier with that. they can guide us to take claim with other policy also .but they didnt noticed the same as they want to hide the fact that the stock is not insured while they debited the premium.i had launced complaint with R B I ombudsman . now guide me what to do next . as bank is putting pressure on me to pay dues and not saying any thing about my loss. they want to recover their 16 lakh only. while property hypo is more than 1 crore

AVINASH KUMAR SETH says : FIR 37/2004 dt. 18.2.2004 u/s 385/384/354
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. Sd/- 20/4/2005 Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya) To Shri V.S. Chauhan PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.) true copy attested Sd/- Mr. Chaman Bhandari, Sr. AO o/o AG (Audit) Delhi AGCR Building, IP Estate NEW DELH To The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.), O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., NewDelhi-110002 I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future. Sd/- Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA) Witness 1 J.B. Gupta AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05 2 Jawahar Lal A.O. (Admn.) O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05 “Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’ Dy. No…….62………. Date……21/4….. now case is for final arguments on the above letters as a witness from her office competent authority or officers, on the above basis i won the case or not?

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799