RAKHI BUDHIRAJA ADVOCATE's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 1121

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Jayant says : ME degree
i have done a particular master degree in engineering from A university , earlier the same master degree in engineering was under B university , in both the universities the syllabus as well as the teaching faculties were same , the persons those who have done masters degree in engineering from B university got promoted on the basis of masters degree but now the persons those doing masters from A university are being questioned by the interview panel just because the board of studies was different in B university and board of studies is different in A university , in this case , what should the persons those who have done from A university should do .

puneet saxena says : selection in govt. jobs:merit(acadmic)VsEntrance
Respected Sir/Madam If govt. tries to compare the candidates(open for govt. jobs) on non-comparable ground then is it against the article 16 of indian constitution that guarantee equal opportunity in all govt. jobs? the whole matter is as follows UP government has started entrance process for basic teacher training(BTC) for 17800 seats from 16 may 2010(source Amar Ujala News Paper Dated-16 May 2010).candidates will be selected on the basis of merit( marks obtained in 10th,12th and in graduation).one candidates can apply for one district only.for detail please see amar ujala news paper dated 16 may 2010. last date for submitting form is 8th june. Besides it the UP govt has taken decision to select the PGT/TGT teacher on the basis of merit.(academic score) But i and a lot of people like me have following objections. 1.Different boards/universities candidate will apply for BTC. how can we compare different board/university students on the basis of their marks. each board or university has different syllabus,different marking pattern.this can be easily proved by seeing past results,boards guideline for evaluation and by seeing syllabus of the same class. for example- a up board student of class twelve has combined syllabus for eleventh and twelfth class and has to prepare both year syllabus for 12th board exam while CBSE student has different syllabus for 11th and 12th. 2. my second objection is students of different streams of the same board/university or different board/university and of same stream but with different subjects can not be compared. some subjects are more scoring than others.this can be easily seen by checking past record. for example students who have home science, music etc subjects will get higher marks than a economics' s student marks. some subjects have practical components and the students who have practical subjects easily get higher marks in practical component. 3.professional courses can not be compared with academic courses.professional courses has two types of evaluation. first internal and second- university based exam evaluation. in internal marking system most of the students easily get 80 to 100% marks. so a BCA ,BBA student can not be compared with a B.A. student whose evaluation is done only on the basis of university exam. 4-the student of same board or different board/university passing in different years can not be compared.education sector is changing at very fast pace. every year something new has been added and the facilities ,teacher method , evaluation method, syllabus and the government also are changing.so we can see the result of these changes on the marks of the students. _ In up board when i passed the high school in 1999 , the Kalyan Singh led BJP government was there.CM kalyan Singh introduced nakal adyadesh(ordinance) .if any body found copying would had to go to jail. that year highschool result was only 29%. _ Up to1999 there was a combined syllabus for 9th and 10th and 10th student had to prepare for both year syllabus for 10th exam.the marking pattern has also changed. in earlier time in maths and science no marks were given if the answer is wrong but now step marking is done and marks is given for right steps without considering answer is wrong or right. _now in UP nakal mafia is on high. there are several instances of paper leaks, group copying etc.(read editorial in amar ujala dated 16 may 2010) _besides these there are varying infrastructure in villages, small cities and big cities that affect the mark securing ability of the students in their early stage of education.but they are in no ways less intelligent for the other students who are securing more marks. 5.there is a provision of 50% parallel reservation for women.the net effect is that there is only 25% seats are available unreserved.it is opposed to various courts decision in which court stated that total reservation should not exceed 50% upper cap.i am not opposed to the women reservation but excess of everything is bad because it will create social imbalance in society and we all of us has to face the bad effects of it. please place your views in detail.i want to file a PIL against UP govt. order because govt. is trying to compare the candidates on non-comparable ground that is against the article 16 of indian constitution that guarantee equal opportunity in all govt. jobs.The govt. rightly has the power to set the criteria but that should be reasonable.The elected govt. should work according to declared policy not arbitrarily.the govt should set the policy when she will conduct entrance exam or when she will make selection according to merit based on academic score. i sent similar letter to NCTE(national council for teachers education) and ncte's reply is as follows "This is in response to your e-mail dt. 17.05.2010 in connection with entrance test going to be conducted by Govt. of Uttar Pradesh for admission to BTC Course. You have serious objections about the criteria being adopted by Govt. of UP, though this matter pertains to State Government however, as per NCTE Regulation 2009 the admission shall be made on merit on the basis of marks obtained in qualifying examination and / or any other selection process as per the policy of State Govt. / UT Admn. In view of this stipulation, the State Govt. of UP has adopted any of such pattern NCTE treats it compliance of NCTE Regulation 2009. (Dr. S.K.Chauhan) Programme Officer NCTE " i am an unemployed youth and don't have sufficient resources to file a PIL. can you help me because it's not a matter of single person .it's going to affects lacs of people. looking forward to your comments. puneet saxena 9286671588 puneetsaxena_2009@rediffamil.com

svvsai devarabhotla says : Regarding Engagement
Iam Suresh working in MNC as a Techlead, i would like to know one information, I met one girl in her Relatives home and we like each other and we loved nearly 6 months and i spent more than 1.5lakhs(I have bills), after that her parents did the engagement for both of us in front of my family members, after that we fought eachother for small topic like she had some boy frnds, till that time she like me and loved me a lot after she said no to me, without consulting me her parents returned all the engagement items to my uncle and they took one sign on normal paper saying he received all the items(ex:- gifts, dresses, gold..etc), this was happend before 5months, but still iam remembering her and loving her, after the cancellation between their parents and my uncle(without my intervention) i used to call to their mobiles, everybody changed their numbers and they used to scold me a lot and lot(with no extent), kindly suggest me how can i proceed on them legally (i need to get the girl or money)

DR SURESHA G says : illegal will & gift deed
Dear Sir/Madam My name is Dr. Suresha; I filed a civil suite against all of my family members for my share in the property 2003. Then we compromised before elders of the society and the shares were allotted as follows: 1. Plaintiff i.e. me. 2. My father and my mother 3. My uncle-1 4. My uncle-2 5. My uncle-3 6. My sister-1 7. My brother joint name with my father. A decree by Taluk Court for Shares of my father and mother issued with terms and conditions that Father and Mother have to enjoy their shares during their life time and after their death properties will go to Plaintiff. i.e. me. (Because I was living with my parents. Me and my father were looking after shares 1 & 2.) I agreed for this property distribution and I left properties to my parents as I was working in government sector). My brother he was notorious we had a fear that he may sell his share, which was earned by my father and hence I put my father as joint holder. Everything was fine up to 2007. Me and my parents living together and my brother was living separate. I, went out on various assignments in 2004 and abroad to Africa. During this period my brother came to my parents and taken in charge of all our properties I,e mine and of my parents and enjoyed all the income. In 2007 he developed conflict internally and taken my mother with him and went separate again. My father was alone and he started taking care of my share and the share of them. My wife was taken care of him. Once again I got the abroad placement in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Because of mild heart attach he was in hospital in Jan 2008. During this time my brother took my mother to Sub-Registrar Office and registered a will from her to his son. (The property was issued to my parents, with terms and conditions and for which decree was issued and this property deed was registered jointly in the sub registrar office). My mother alone registered the will without my fatherâ€™s consent. After 5 days my father passed away suspiciously, my brother did not allowed me to participate in his funeral as I was abroad. I went a day after and performed my duties and came back to Saudi. From 2008 to till to day I cleared all the back debts which was upon my and my parents share (10.5 lakhs). My brother was enjoying all my share and my parentâ€™s share which was previously written a will to me. Recently my mother also passed away, just before her death my brother misinterpreted her and transferred all properties, which was in joint name of my parents, through will and gift deed. I request your kind self to clear my doubts. 1. Is there any possibility of losing my property which was supposed to be transfer after the death of my parents? 2. Apart from this my father had few properties in his name. Which were, ancestral and self purchased. After his death my brother transferred these to my mother and then she registered will to my brighter. 3. Is there any possibility of filing suit against my brother who had my father as a joint share holder ? Please clarify my doubts. Since 6 months i am waiting for your opinion . Now my brother illegally wit the help of some gundas occupied my house which was supposed to transfer to me after the death of my parents . He changed the khata by producing the gift deed made by my mother Please let me know about the consequences. Very Truely yours Dr Suresh

Sanjay says : Seeking Lawyer
Madam, Are you practising in New Delhi.If yes, pl give me your contact no.If no, pl give some references from New Delhi.

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799