Proceed exparty order can be set aside how many times?

Your husband seems to misusing the process of law. As such does not restricting such applications but you can oppose the application pointing out the practice adopted and misuse of process of law. Donot get dishearted. Courts are there to do justice. There are judgement in support of your case so use the judgement to get application dismissed. Best of luck. 

Subsequent to above advise:

Prefer to engage a very able local senior counsel of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in Family matters....

yOUR HUSBAND'S  ATTITUDE IS NOTHING BUT  ABUSING THE PROCESS OF COURT ,TIME AND MONEY.

Dismissing an appeal of a woman who sought right to lead defence in a family dispute, a sessions court here cited her repeated non-appearance during proceedings and said no one can be permitted to abuse the process of court by delaying tactics

 rejected the appeal of the woman, a south-Delhi resident, against the order of a magisterial court denying her the right to lead defence due to her repeated non-appearance in court and failure to pay costs imposed upon her.

“I have gone through the copy of the impugned order which categorically reflects that despite availing several opportunities, the petitioner (woman), who is still stated to be residing in the Unites States due to her official work, had never bothered to come to the court to depose even on a single occasion.

“The conduct of the petitioner is self-reflected from the impugned order and it is also the settled preposition of law that no party can be permitted to abuse the process of court by indulging into such dilatory and delaying tactics only with the sole intention to cause harassment to other party,” the judge said.

The court upheld the magisterial court’s order saying that it did not find any illegality or infirmity in that order warranting any interference. “Hence, the revision petition is dismissed,” it said.

The woman had filed the petition challenging the magisterial court’s order by which her right to lead defence in a case against her husband and in-laws was closed.

# Dalip Singh V. State of U.P & Ors (2010)2 SCC 114

# Amar v. Union of India & Ors. (20011)7 SCC 69

# State of Uttaranchal v Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors. (2010) 3 SCC 402).

Access jurisprudence requires Courts to deal with the legitimated litigation whatever be its form but decline to exercise jurisdiction, if such litigation is an abuse of the process of the Court. USE THE ABOVE CASE LAW  WHICH PASSED JUDGEMENTS OVER ABUSE  OF PROCESS OF COURT AND GET YOUR HUSBAND'S   SET ASIDE EXPARTE ORDER APPLICATIONS DISMISSED.

Thankyou so much Ms.Usha Kapoor for these judgements.....Godbless....

Dear eastrANGED WIFE,

                                        _PlEASE VISIT MY HUSE in hYDERABAD. i NEED YOUR HELP AND BLESSINGS. MY EMAIL ADDRESs is  : ushakapoor310@gmail.com/.. I've sent you  3  PMS also. Please check them ansd respond.

Thanks for sharing in the forum Ms. Usha Kapoor.

After giving application to set aside the exparty order neither husband nor his lawyer turn up to argue on their own application on date scheduled so his application was rejected.A date was set up for exparty argument and he did not turn up even on that date. Today exparty RCR order was passed in my favour by The Hon'ble Judge of Family Court...:)))))

Thanks to all of you for replying to my query...

Wish you the best.