Cross examination - admissions or not?

Originally posted by : jack
	Dear Experts, Could you please let me know whether the below cross examination recorded points in Crpc 125 by family court.by wife are admissions or not? can i file perjury based on it? 1. It is not true to suggest that my parents gave dowry of Rs.10 lakhs to the respondent , presented 20 sovereigns of gold ornaments,10,000 towards Adapadachu Lanchanaas. 2. It is not true to suggest that respondent and his parents demanded additional dowry of Rs.20 lakhs. 3. It is not true to suggest that respondent demanded me to transfer the property of my father.

Yes, you can file perjury based on above. 

First i want to know whether those are admissions or not ? 

Advocates please suggest me. i have DVC also so that i can mark those as Exibits.

Nobody can ever tell you the value of three answers in isolation of the entire examination in chief and the entire cross. You may pick, choose and read three responses in isolation, which I'd consider a selective, self-serving reading of evidence and that is not how a Court is ever going to read evidence. Let me give you a hypothetical addition to this cross (hypothetical, since you have quoted this miniscule part of evidence):

xxxxxx

It is not true to suggest that my parents gave dowry of Rs.10 lakhs to the respondent, presented 20 sovereigns of gold ornaments,10,000 towards Adapadachu Lanchanaas. (Vol., again said) This dowry was total Rs.50 lakhs.

It is not true to suggest that respondent demanded me to transfer the property of my father. (Vol.) the respondent repeatedly told me that he will only be happy if my father's property is transferred
 

Howzzat?

Please maintain the decency and dignity of the forum and LCI. Thank you.

Guys,

We are moving this chain in wrong direction, please dont do it.

If you are adavacate and legally aware only respond to it.

below is  her deposiotion for those 3 points. 

"my parents gave dowry of Rs.10 lakhs to the respondent , presented 20 sovereigns of gold ornaments,10,000 towards Adapadachu Lanchanaas. Respondent and his parents demanded additional dowry of Rs.20 lakhs.Also respondent demanded me to transfer the property of my father. "

Now i want to know whether those 3 points are admissions or not? so that i can mark that document in DVC.

Thanks

Originally posted by : jack
	Guys, We are moving this chain in wrong direction, please dont do it. If you are adavacate and legally aware only respond to it. below is  her deposiotion for those 3 points.  "my parents gave dowry of Rs.10 lakhs to the respondent , presented 20 sovereigns of gold ornaments,10,000 towards Adapadachu Lanchanaas. Respondent and his parents demanded additional dowry of Rs.20 lakhs.Also respondent demanded me to transfer the property of my father. " Now i want to know whether those 3 points are admissions or not? so that i can mark that document in DVC. Thanks

Do you have a advocate representing you in the Court of Law? If yes, what is his or her opinion regarding this? Please let me know, so that I can suggest you whether you are going in right direction or not.

Originally posted by : ladies finger ring
	Jack and jill went up the hill.... is nursery rhyme.

Jack and Jill went up the hill, God knows what went on up there, Jill came down screaming iPill iPill ... is University rhyme.

@ Author 

until and uncless the petition , affidivat and the certified copy of the cross examination are seen nothing can be said . I have attached herewith a Book which i had poted earlier " The art of cross examination " you can observe how they get the truth out . 

Try to finish of your cases and get out of it and do go not  on filing N no of cases . You will just waste your time and money and your youth just fighting cases with grey hair on your head . Enjoy life to the fullest either single or ready to mingle with others ,