I wanted to have an exper opinon for the following querries. In deed of surrender signed by my father for self and on behalf of his brothers reliquishing the right of ancestral property without any consideratin. He had not reliquinshed the right as karata of his family i.e. myself,my wife and two daughters. In the deed of relinquishment I have signed as a witness in the deed. Some of the lawyers state that by signing the witness you have nt given up your rights in the ancestral property and more than 50% states that by signing as a witness you have only witnesseth the signature of your father who had signed before you and dinot give the right of your ancestral properties. I wanted to have an expert opinion with latest supreme court judgement that by signing as witness does not mean that I have given up my right in the property. Can you suggest whether I have given right,title,interest in the property or I have signed as a witness to my gfathers signature.I want your expert opinion.If there is any charge I will pay for the supreme Court rulings. Await your reply
