LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

GV SUBBA RAMAIAH (freelancer)     22 October 2015

Denial stagnation increment befitting to cadre

Dear Sir,

We are facing a dilemma and a denial of honour of retiring in the designation fitting Pay.The enclosed is a letter addressed by me to the Senior Vice President how we are denied of justice. Please help us / our group whether we have any legal remedy against this injustice and denial of retiring with due pay befitting our designation and scale.

Presently the MMGS-111 is given 4 increments after reaching the Top of the scale. The present arrangement made by IBA even if the MMGS-11 are not promoted allows the juniors to reach the top of the scale but limits with three increments. Earlier in 6th & 7th BPS the MMGS-111 were not having any stagnation increments even if they are higher in cadre and designation. Starting of stagnation increments to the lower scale of Scale-1 and scale-11 officers prior to the the MMGS-111 has resulted in the anomoly of an early start of the stagnation increments and even bypassing a MMGS-111 officers even if later in the 8th and 9th BPS the MMGS-111 are allowed Stagnation increments.

Please go through the representation which may help in better understanding of the issue.

With regards.

G V SUBBARAMAIAH



Learning

 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register