Manish 23 January 2019
P. Venu (Advocate) 24 January 2019
You have notposted the complete facts.
Manish 24 January 2019
P. Venu (Advocate) 05 February 2019
Questions of fact could be decided in trial. Now that the High Court has given the stay, get the trial expedited.
Suhail suhail (LAWYER) 06 February 2019
Agree with Mr.P Venu;
You can deny the allegations and pove them wrong.
Manish 06 February 2019
Suhail suhail (LAWYER) 06 February 2019
Dear you need not mention any sections of IPC in the written statement.
Just for your information below are the sections for frauds in IPC;
Chapter XI ; Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice
Sections from 193 to 210 IPC
Whoever corruptly uses or attempts to use as true or genuine evidence any evidence which he knows to be false or fabricated, shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave or fabricated false evidence. Indian Penal Code, 1860 199. False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidenceWhoever, in any declaration made or subscribed by him, which declaration any Court of Justice, or any public servant or other person, is bound or authorized by law to receive as evidence of any fact, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, touching any point material to the object for which the declaration is made or used, shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave false evidence. 210. Fraudulently obtaining decree for sum not dueWhoever fraudulently obtains a decree or order against any person for a sum not due or for a larger sum than is due, or for any property or interest in property to which he is not entitled, or fraudulently causes a decree or order to be executed against any person after it has been satisfied or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, or fraudulently suffers or permits any such act to be done in his name, shall be punished with imprisonment of either descripttion for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. |
P. Venu (Advocate) 06 February 2019
You are, I am afraid, pursuing a disjointed approach. Your priority, at this juncture, ought to be to establish your inability in meeting her demand as to amount of maintainance. Every thing else is secondary. Wrong approach may turn out to be unhelpful for your cause.
Manish 06 February 2019