Why do you consider lay men as without knowledge. All of us are laymen in some or the other fields. Although I feel that you are not qualified enough to appreciate a differing view, for the general knowledge of all those in this forum, here are some links (credible, not copy pastes from personal blogs) that talk about the harmful effects of radiation from cell phone towers... (of course advocates who are representing cell phone companies or their nominated people will continue to deny this)
Before this, lets remind ourselves that the issue is HIGHER levels of radiation from cell phone towers in India compared to admissible norms that are internationally followed...
American Cancer Society doesnt believe that cancer is possible through radiation BELOW A PERMISSIBLE LIMIT (which means there has to be a minimum criteria.. absent in India)
https://www.cancer.org/Cancer/CancerCauses/OtherCarcinogens/AtHome/cellular-phone-towers
Results of Scientific Studies of Radiation on HUmans, including cell phones (ALso includes a report on guidelines by the EU parliament on advertising and disclosures regarding cell phones) - https://www.goodhealthinfo.net/radiation/health_efx_western.htm
Article on Cell Phone Tower Radiation Hazards - https://www.emwatch.com/Cellmasts.htm
Article by scientist on how even LOW LEVEL OF RADIATION is a cause for concern - https://www.scribd.com/doc/3773284/Health-Effects-from-Cell-Phone-Tower-Radiation [READ THIS REPORT FULLY ON HOW COMPANIES MANIPULATE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS TO SHOW RESULTS THAT ARE FAVORABLE TO THEM]
Our federal government also once told us that asbestos, cigarettes, thalidomide, and the blood supply were "safe", but which were later found to be harmful.“You can bet that their studies are going to show whatever theywant them to show.”– Cathy Bergman-Veniza, at Vermont Law School Environmental Law Center Conference, 1996
At one point, Cigarette companies used to flatly deny that smoking was injurious to health. And guess what, they even produced scientific studies from prestigious institutions to back their claims... Eventually sense prevailed and the trail of funding for research was unearthed...
Having a contrarian view about something is acceptable and healthy at times.... To imply that someone is a layman only because the opinion is contrary is the recourse of an incompetant lawyer. If radiation was indeed not harmful, there wouldnt be FCC mandated levels of radiation for cell phone towers...
