Attached.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 20 August 2013
Attached.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 20 August 2013
The judgment shown by Mr Kumar Doab refers to Devdutt case which lays down that every adverse entry must be communicated. It clearly implies that the entry has to be communicated by the department suo motto and it further implies that non-following this procedure renders the ACR void.
Further, no rule/judgment cast any duty upon the employee to himself seek copies of the ACR under RTI and correct mistake of the department and keep on begging for expunction of the remarks.
The right of making representation is only against ACR and not against probation assessment report (yes it may be harsh but it is the rule)
Abhinav Jha (Advocate) 20 August 2013
“May God help people who have some persistent problem in understanding simple and plain English...!!!”. Or else they would obliviously continue to misquote others, to misinterpret others and to draw incorrect inference of others’ statements.
[Writing a single more word would be a sheer waste of time.]
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 21 August 2013
It is upto the querist whether he has to encash the fault of the deptt or to ractify it.