LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Judgments and Orders by N.K.Assumi

avatarView Full Profile

VIKAS & ORS. Vs State of Maharasthra

 25 August 2011

Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire; i.e. a man will not meet his Maker with a lie in his mouth. A dying man is face to face with his Maker without any motive for telling a lie. 23. Truth said Mathew Arnold, sits upon the lips of a dying man . 24...

Posted in Criminal Law |   3423 hits

Prabhudayal And Others vs State Of Maharashtra

 25 August 2011

To prove quilt of an accused person by circumstantial evidence. They are:- (1) The circumstance from which tile conclusion is drawn should be fully proved; (2) the circumstances should he conclusive in nature; (3)all the facts so established should..

Posted in Criminal Law 1 comments |   2800 hits

RAM BIHARI YADAV Vs STATE OF bIHAR

 25 August 2011

Though dying declaration is indirect evidence being a specie of hearsay, yet it is an exception to the rule against admissibility of hearsay evidence. Indeed, it is substantive evidence and like any other substantive evidence requires no corroboratio..

Posted in Criminal Law |   3580 hits

Rais @ Toun & Ors. …Appellants Vs.

 25 August 2011

“The opinion given by a medical witness need not be the last word on the subject. Such an opinion shall be tested by the court. If the opinion is bereft of logic or objectivity, the court is not obliged to go by that opinion. After all opinion is wha..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2267 hits

K. NEELAVENI ..... APPELLANT VERSUS

 25 August 2011

In our opinion, when a report is submitted to the Magistrate he is required to be prima facie satisfied that the facts disclosed therein constitute an offence. It is trite that the Magistrate is not bound by the conclusion of the investigating agency..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2721 hits

Satya Narayan Tiwari @ Jolly & Anr. Vs. State Of U.P

 25 August 2011

Crimes against women are not ordinary crimes committed in a fit of anger or for property. They are social crimes. They disrupt the entire social fabric. Hence, they call for harsh punishment. Unfortunately, what is happening in our society is that ou..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2453 hits

Wakkar & Anr. Vs. State Of U.P.

 25 August 2011

That there is a long mental distance between `may be true' and `must be true' and the same divides conjectures from sure conclusions; [see Tanviben Pankajkumar Divetia v. State of Gujarat1]. ..

Posted in Criminal Law |   1826 hits

State Of U.P. Vs. Krishna Master & Ors

 25 August 2011

In the deposition of witnesses, there are always normal discrepancies, howsoever, honest and truthful they may be. These discrepancies are due to normal errors of observation, normal errors of memory due to lapse of time, due to mental disposition, s..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2173 hits

Aqeel Ahmad Vs. State of U.P.

 25 August 2011

`The proceedings under Section 174 have a very limited scope. The object of the proceedings is merely to ascertain whether a person has died under suspicious circumstances or an unnatural death and if so what is the apparent cause of the death. The q..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2523 hits

State Of U.P vs Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal

 18 August 2011

The essential ingredients to prove guilt of an accused person by circumstantial evidence are: (1) the circumstances from which the conclusion is drawn should be fully proved; (2) the circumstances should be conclusive in nature; (3) all the facts so..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2775 hits

Kamalakar Nandram Bhavsar And ... vs State Of Maharashtra

 18 August 2011

. It is very surprising that a doctor who admittedly did not treat a patient during her life time would be called upon to certify the fitness of the patient to make a dying declaration when other doctors who treated the said patient were available fo..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2534 hits

State Of Assam vs Mafizuddin Ahmed

 18 August 2011

. It is not outside the realm of probability that her statement may have been inspired by her uncle and, therefore, it will not be safe to base the conviction of respondent on such a dying declaration. The other direct evidence is the deposition of ..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2317 hits

Fahim Khan Vs. State Of Bihar Now Jharkhand

 18 August 2011

It is, however, equally well-settled that an objection as to prejudice must be taken at the earliest [see Shobit Chamar & Anr. Versus State of Bihar (1998 (3) SCC 455) ] and prejudice must be shown before a trial could be said to be invalidated [..

Posted in Criminal Law |   3233 hits

Yakub Ismailbhai Vs State of Gujarat

 18 August 2011

"In England where provision has been made for the reception of unsworn evidence from a child it has always been provided that the evidence must be corroborated in some material particular implicating the accused. But in the Indian Act there is no suc..

Posted in Criminal Law |   2309 hits

Parkash Rai vs J.N. Dhar

 18 August 2011

As regards the affidavits, copies of such documents cannot be taken in evidence. What 'evidence' means and includes is defined in Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. Affidavits are not included in its definition. On the contrary, affidavits have be..

Posted in Civil Law |   3751 hits

Parkash Rai vs J.N. Dhar

 18 August 2011

As regards the affidavits, copies of such documents cannot be taken in evidence. What 'evidence' means and includes is defined in Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. Affidavits are not included in its definition. On the contrary, affidavits have be..

Posted in Civil Law |   2191 hits

Sher Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab

 14 August 2011

What is essential is that the person recording the dying declaration must be satisfied that the deceased was in a fit state of mind. Where it is proved by the testimony of the Magistrate that the declarant was fit to make the statement without there ..

Posted in Criminal Law |   6158 hits

Jharkhand Justice Forum And Anr., ... vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 29

 20 July 2011

Their Lordships held that the de facto doctrine is now well established that the acts of officers de facto performed by them within the scope of their assumed official authority, in the interest of the public or third persons and not for their own be..

Posted in Constitutional Law |   2037 hits

State Of Uttaranchal And Ors. vs Sidharth Srivastava And Ors.

 20 July 2011

Section 78(4) in The Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 The National Commission For Backward Classes Act, 1993 Article 323(2) in The Constitution Of India 1949 Section 78 in The Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 The Uttar Pradesh Reorgan..

Posted in Constitutional Law |   2194 hits

I. R. Cohelo Vs. State Of Tamilnadu: An Analysis Of The Case Relating To 9th Schedule Under Indian Constitution

 11 July 2011

An Analysis Of The Case Relating To 9th Schedule Under Indian Constitution..

Posted in Constitutional Law |   4565 hits