View Full Profile
The Hon’ble Court observed that according to section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act (1872), it is clear that in a valid contract the consideration need not flow from the promisee only. It could flow from any other person who is not a party to such c..
The court unanimously held that Dunlop Tyres Ltd. Could not claim for damages in this case. It observed that firstly, only a party to the contract can file a claim. Secondly, there was no consideration flowing from Dunlop to Selfridge hence there was..
Rule 38 of BCCI Rules was examined and it was held that it only stipulated the creation of a committee and not a Commissioner to inquire concerning the procedure for conducting proceedings in case of misconduct, hence the appointment of commissioner ..
The CCI absolved Hockey India from all the allegations entering into anti-competitive agreements and abusing dominant position. It held that there was no contravention of provisions of the Competition Act by the HI however CCI set out a possibility o..
On 28 April 2008, the Indian Olympic Association (“IOA”) temporarily suspended its recognition of the IHF. The IHF has challenged this decision in Indian courts. On 18 July 2008, officials of the FI and the IOA met in Hyderabad, India, and discussed,..
The court considered the current contract to be a perfectly valid contract and with good consideration. It was held that plaintiff and other persons interested could sue for the amount subscribed and defendant has to pay the money promised. Hence, th..
The court upheld the order of the High Court negativing the relief to the appellant, either because of lack of the privity of the contract or due to non-applicability of s.70 of the Act. The appellant had not done anything directly to the respondent...
The contract which is -sought to be enforced by the present plaintiffs is, therefore, hit by Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act as being immoral and as such it is not enforceable in Court. In conclusion, the appeal succeeded, the Judgments and dec..
The appeal filed on 5 April 2012 by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) against the decision of the Indian Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel issued on 17 March 2011 is admissible and upheld. Ms. Ashwini, Ms. Panwar, Ms. Mary Th..
It was held that gambling or conducting the business of gambling is extra-commercium and hence not included within the meaning of ‘trade, commerce or intercourse’. Consequently, it is not protected by the fundamental right to trade and profession und..
M.C. Chacko was held not personally liable to satisfy the debt under the letter of guarantee. Properties which were under the Schedule A of the deed allotted to M.C. Chacko were also held not liable to satisfy the debt due to Kottayam Bank under the ..
The action is brought by a mortgagee to enforce against a purchaser of the mortgaged property an undertaking that he entered into with his vendor. The mortgagee has no right to avail himself of that. He was no party to the sale. The purchaser entered..
The SC did not grant leave to petitioners and upheld the decision of The High Court. The SC recognized that the TRAI is sector specific regulator and has expertise to deal with the issues in the telecom sector, which arise from the Telecom Regulatory..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
