View Full Profile
These appeals arise out the judgment and orders dated 2nd July, 2012, 6th July, 2012 and 6th August, 2012, passed by the Delhi High Court in Crl. M.C. No.2180 of 2012...
All and sundry cannot approach the magistrate for recording of their statement u/s 164 and any witness, unsponsored by the IO/prosecution, cannot seek to get his examination recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C...
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court of India is commendable. The apex court has established that the judiciary is independent and dedicated to protecting the rights of the last citizen of the country...
The Court set aside the impugned order of High Court and allowed the appellants to remain on bail pursuant to the bond already executed by them...
The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court affirming that of the Sessions Court convicting and sentencing the respondents...
The Court dismissed the appeal against the order of the Kerala High Courtfor grant of bail to the respondent...
The judgment deals with a writ petition filed by Journalist Amish Devgan seeking quashing of FIRs lodged against him for his remarks against Sufi Saint Moinnuddin Chisthi. The question before the court was that whether the First Information Reports s..
The following judgement deals with the principle of promissory estoppel in a case where the Jharkhand Government had failed to give effect to the Industrial Policy and subsequent Notification that promised 50% rebate to Industrial Units on electricit..
The approach adopted by the Delhi High Court is much upholding the rightful procedures of the Court. The High Court of Delhi has pointed out the error in the cognizance of the Trial Court and has remanded the matter back to the Trial Court to make th..
The single judge bench of Justice Sunil Thomas rejected the arguments of the petitioners and upheld the Constitutional validity of sections 29 and 30 of POCSO Act...
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
