IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL
BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER &
SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA Nos. 3264 & 3265/Del/2010
A.Yrs.: 2002-03 & 2003-04
Emerson Process Management Power &
Water Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.,
Windsor IT Park, Tower-A, Ground & 1st
Floor, A-I, Sector-125, Noida – 201 301
(PAN: AAACW 2693N)
(Appellant)
Vs.
ACIT, Ward 18(3),
(Respondent)
Assessee by: None
Department by: Sh. Vikas Suryavanshi, Sr. D.R.
O R D E R
PER U.B.S. BEDI: JM
These appeals of the assessee emanate from separate orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XX,
2. Despite having got adjourned cases from 8.6.2012 to 28.6.2012, nobody appeared, nor any adjournment request has been received, when the case was called up for hearing. Therefore, we infer that assessee is not interested in prosecuting these appeals.
3. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decision of the Tribunal including in the case of C.I.T. vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgement of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (M.P.), we treat both the appeals of the assessee as un-admitted and dismiss the same.
4. The assessee, if so desired, shall be free to move this Tribunal praying for recalling this order and explaining reasons for non-compliance etc. then this order may be recalled.
5. In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee, are dismissed, for non-prosecution.
Order pronounced in the
Sd/- Sd/-
[SHAMIM YAHYA] [U.B.S. BEDI]
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Date:
SRBhatnagar
Copy forwarded to: -
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT (A)
5. DR, ITAT
TRUE COPY
By Order,
Assistant Registrar, ITAT,
