SC constitutes a Committee on road safety

Court :
Supreme Court of India
Brief :
The bench comprising of Chief Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice N.V. Ramana in a Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution has appointed a three-member committee to monitor the Central and State Governments on issues pertaining to road safety. Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan has been appointed as the Chairperson of the said Committee w.e.f. 15th May, 2014. The State Governments as well as different ministries, departments and wings of the Central Government looking after issues pertaining to road safety have been directed to submit their first report to the Committee within three months indicating the implementation and enforcement of all laws pertaining to the following: (i) licensing (ii) certification of fitness of vehicles (iii) limits of use of vehicles i.e. passenger carrying capacity, weight carrying capacity etc. (iv) use of road safety devices (v) adherence to norms including user of roads, and (vi) deployment of adequate manpower for enforcement of the existing provisions of law.
Citation :
Pt. Parmanand Katara vs. Union of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 295 OF 2012

REPORTABLE

S. RAJASEEKARAN ... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... RESPONDENT (S)

RANJAN GOGOI, J.

J U D G M E N T

1. The petitioner is a leading orthopaedic surgeon of the

country and the Chairman and Head of the Department of

Orthopaedic Surgery in the Ganga Hospital at Coimbatore.

He was/is also the President of the Indian Orthopaedic

Association, the largest professional body of orthopaedic

Page 1

surgeons in the country. In the course of his professional

duties spanning over several decades the petitioner, while

rendering professional service to victims of road accidents,

has come to realise that the large number of accidents that

occur every day on the Indian roads, causing loss of human

lives besides loss of limbs and other injuries resulting in

human tragedies, are wholly avoidable. In the light of the

experience gained and propelled by a desire to render

service beyond the call of duty, the petitioner has filed this

writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking the

Court’s intervention, primarily, in the matter of enforcement

of the prevailing laws and also seeking directions for

enactment of what the petitioner considers to be more

appropriate legislative measures and for more affirmative

administrative action. The petitioner also seeks directions

from the Court for upliftment of the existing infrastructure

and facilities with regard to post-accident care and

management to minimize loss of life and physical injuries to

victims of road accidents.

Page 2

2. In the context of the aforesaid effort, the petitioner has

set out detailed statistics published by the Ministry of Road

Transport and Highways (MoRTH) in the volume “Road

Accidents in India 2010” highlighting the extent of increase

of road accidents and fatal cases between 1970-2010. In the

aforesaid publication in which the relevant figures are

pegged to the year 2010 it is reported that road traffic

accidents in the said year i.e. 2010 numbered nearly

5,00,000 resulting in approximately 1,30,000 deaths and

serious injuries including amputation of limbs to over

5,00,000 persons. One serious road accident in the country

occurs every minute; and one person dies in a road traffic

accident every 4 minutes. Road traffic accidents, therefore,

have the potential of being one of the largest challenges to

orderly human existence necessitating immediate and

urgent intervention. Not only the existing laws, which by

themselves are inadequate, are not being implemented in

the right earnest; the need for changes in such laws and

upgradation thereof, though admitted, are yet to see the

light of the day. Besides, victims of road traffic accidents die

Page 3

in large numbers due to lack of timely and proper medical

attention which, inter alia, is caused by avoidable disputes

with regard to jurisdiction of the administrative authorities

including the police who are to deal with the matter instead

of rendering immediate medical aid to the victim. Failure to

provide immediate medical attention resulting in death and

irreversible injuries is also due to inadequate facilities for

early removal of the victims of road accident to the nearest

hospitals/medical centres. Inadequate number of

ambulances and other suitable modes of transport to

transport the victims of road accidents; the absence of

trauma centres in different hospitals, and lack of even basic

health care facilities are additional features that contribute

to the unimpeded growth of the imminent menace to human

life. Such unabated growth, it may be mentioned, is

reflected in the figures beyond 2010 also. In fact, the

corresponding figures of the year 2012 available in

“Accidental Deaths and Suicides in 2012” a publication of the

National Crime Records Bureau show a uniform graph for all

Page 4

the relevant figures i.e. number of road accidents; fatal cases

as well as serious injury cases.

3. The petitioner has not visualized the magnitude of the

problem that he seeks to highlight on the basis of his

individual perceptions. He seeks to base his contentions on

reports submitted by the Working Groups constituted by the

MoRTH to survey the different facets of the problem as well

as research and authoritative articles published on the

subject by persons of eminence. It will, therefore, be

necessary to briefly outline what has been dealt with and

indicated in the said reports and publications.

4. At the outset, there are the reports of four Working

Groups set up by the first respondent to submit

recommendations and suggestions on short term and long

term measures to curb road accidents in the country. The

said four Working Groups were required to go into four ‘Es’ of

road safety, namely, Engineering, Enforcement, Education

and Emergency Care.

Page 5

5. According to the Working Group on Enforcement, as on

date, India has the distinction of having one of the highest

number of accidents and fatalities on roads. After a detailed

study the Working Group has recommended, in the main, the

following measures for road safety :

(a) Amendment of Motor Vehicles Act to increase

fines and to provide for revision of fines every

3 years based on the Consumer Price Index.

(b) Overloading of commercial vehicles should be

prosecuted under the Damage to Public

Property Act. Liability should be imposed on

the transporter, consignor and consignee.

no exemption for wearing helmets (such as

the exemptions in favour of women in some

States). Seatbelts should be compulsory for

driver and front-seat passenger. On national

highways, seatbelts should be compulsory for

back-seat passengers, too.

(d) In case of drunken driving (Section 20/185,

MV Act), the norm should be suspension of

the driving license and should be strictly

enforced by traffic police and courts.

Page 6

(e) Traffic Violations Database should be

maintained to record data of violating

vehicles, drivers and offences committed.

This would help identify habitual offenders

who could be awarded enhanced punishment.

(f) Checking of overcrowded passenger vehicles,

and cancellation of permit.

(g) Improvement of road engineering: Concerned

departments must inspect roads where

frequent accidents occur.

(h) Digitization of driving licenses in the country,

so that defaulters cannot obtain other

licenses (upon cancellation or suspension of

their license).

(i) Issue of Fitness certificate for commercial

vehicles should be based on stringent

inspection.

6. The Working Group on Emergency Care took note of the

fact that a large number of potentially salvageable patients

die needlessly due to delay in retrieval and inadequate or

ineffective treatment. In its report the Working Group had

Page 7

enumerated the following problems in accident and

emergency care delivery in India :

(i) The general public does not possess basic first aid

skills.

(ii) There is no standardized toll free access number to

call emergency medical help.

(iii) Non availability of appropriate and safe transport

for injured patient in the form of road ambulances,

air ambulances etc.

(iv) The ambulances are inappropriately/ inadequately

equipped.

(v) There is lack of awareness regarding Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India’s directives regarding the

right to emergency care for RTA victims and the

legal protection available to good Samaritans who

offer help to a victim of a road accident.

(vi) There is no provision to ensure adequate

compensation to an RTA victim in case the

accident causing vehicle does not have a third

party insurance.

Page 8

(vii) Majority of the drivers do not have a personal

mediclaim policy to cater to their emergency

medical needs in case of an accident.

7. Insofar as the report of the Working Group on

Engineering is concerned it was observed that the road

network in the country is historically developed with a view

to providing accessibility rather than mobility. In the said

report it was also noted that the available funding for

maintenance and repairs of National Highways Network is

only 35-40% of the estimated fund requirement.

8. Insofar as road safety education is concerned the

following extract from the report of the Working Group on

Road Safety Education would highlight the dimensions of the

issue :

“On an average, 20 percent of all people killed in

road accidents in developing countries are under

the age of fifteen. This is twice as high as in the

developed world. In India, there is one road

accident every minute, and one fatal accident

every fourth minute. There are as many as thirty

five accidents per thousand vehicles, and the

Page 9

drivers involved in road crashes are in the age

group 20-40 years. Two wheelers and cars

contribute to 50 percent of the total accidents.

Road crashes cost approximately one to three

percent of a country’s GDP. Other than road

engineering issues, most of the accidents are

caused by the drivers fault. While some experts

say it is around 50 percent, the MoRTH said that it

was around 80 percent. Whatever be the exact

figure, we do need to focus on education and

enforcement for improving driver performance.”

“Road Safety Education should not remain a

matter of words. Students must be educated in a

way that brings them alive to the issues of road

safety.

The report further states that, “Enforcement has a

key role in encouraging improved road users

behavior. The general deterrence provided by

enforcement authorities will promote public

perception that “compliance everywhere all the

time” is the best way of avoiding penalties and

improving safety. Often fear of the stick works

better than the stick itself.”

Page 10

9. A detailed reference has been made by the petitioner to

the report submitted by Shri S. Sundar [Former Secretary in

the Ministry of Surface Transport and Distinguished Fellow of

The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI)] under whom a

Committee was constituted in the year 2005 to deliberate

and make recommendations for creation of a dedicated body

on road safety and traffic management. The Committee was

also requested to draft the National Road Safety Policy for

consideration of the Government. While submitting its report

in February, 2007 the Committee, inter alia, recommended a

draft National Road Safety Policy which was approved by the

Cabinet in its meeting held on 15.3.2010. The said Policy

outlines the initiatives that are to be taken by the

Government at all levels to improve road safety in the

country. The major initiatives under the Policy are :

(a) To promote awareness about road safety

issues.

(b) To ensure safer road infrastructure by way of

designing safer road, encouraging application

of Intelligent Transport System etc.

Page 11

stage of designing, manufacture, usage,

operation and maintenance.

(d) To strengthen the system of driving licensing

and training to improve the competence of

drivers.

(e) To take measures to ensure safety of

vulnerable road users.

(f) To take appropriate measures for

enforcement of safety laws,

(g) To ensure medical attention for road accident

victims.

(h) To encourage human resource development

and R&D for road safety.

(i) To strengthen the enabling legal, institutional

and financial environment for promoting road

safety culture in the Country.

10. In an article authored by Justice A.R. Lakshmanan,

erstwhile Chairman of the Law Commission, which appeared

in the newspaper “The Hindu” on 10

July, 2011 a number of

suggestions have been offered for road safety. The most

Page 12

significant of the aforesaid suggestions and relied upon by

the petitioner may be usefully extracted below.

“a) For ensuring the safer use of roads it has

been suggested that all State Governments

notify rules in their respective states for the

following:

. The removal and the safe custody of the

vehicles including their loads which have

broken down or which have been left

standing or have been abandoned on a

highway;

. the determination, maintenance and

management of parking places for the

use of vehicles and animals and the

fees, if any, which may be charged for

their use;

. prohibiting the use of footpaths or

pavements by vehicles or animals;

. prohibiting or restricting the use of

audible signals at certain times or in

certain places;

. regulating the loading of vehicles and in

particular, limiting the loads carried in

relation to the size and nature of the

tyres fitted;

. a right of way for ambulances and fire

brigade vehicles;

. the control of animals likely to frighten

other animals or pedestrians;

Page 13

. the control of children on highways;

. prohibiting the riding by more than two

persons at the same time on cycles

other than cycles designed for the

purpose;

. prohibiting the riding of more than two

cycles abreast;

. limiting the age of drivers of vehicles;

. regulating the driving of vehicles of

vehicles and animals at night; and

. regulating the use of highways by

pedestrians.”

b) For ensuring safer public vehicles it has been

suggested that the State Governments of all

States notify the following rules.

(a) The width, height and length of

vehicles;

(b) The size, nature and condition of

wheels and tyres;

(d) Lamps and reflectors;

(e) Warning devices;

Page 14

(f) The inspection of vehicles by prescribed

authorities;

(g) Regulating the particulars exhibited

on vehicles and the manner in which such

particulars shall be exhibited.

c) It has been suggested that the State

Governments notify rules for regulating the

use of public vehicles in the following

manner:

. the documents, plates and marks to be

carried by public vehicles, the manner in

which they are to be carried and the

language in which such documents is to

be expressed;

. the badges and uniforms to be worn by

drivers;

. the fees to be paid for permits, driving

licences, duplicate copies of permits or

driving licences, plates, badges, and

appeals preferred before statutory

authorities;

. the limiting of the number of public

vehicles or public vehicles of any

specified class or description, for which

permits may be granted in any specified

area, or on any specified route or routes;

. the fixing of maximum or minimum fares

or freights;

Page 15

. the maximum number of passengers or

the maximum quantity of goods that

may be carried in a public vehicles;

. the conditions subject to which

passengers, luggage or goods may be

carried in a public vehicle;

. the construction and fittings or and the

equipment to be carried by public

vehicles, whether generally or in

specified areas or on specified routes;

and

. the safe custody and disposal of

property left behind in public vehicles;

d) It has been suggested that the State

Governments notify the following Regulations

for Traffic Personnel to enforce discipline in

regard to :

. Non-observance of traffic rules;

. Jumping the red light;

. Crossing the red light;

. Driving without valid licence;

. Driving under the influence of

liquor/drugs;

. Driving while talking on the mobile;

. Driving without helmet;

Page 16

. Overloading of passengers in autos. In

shared auto-rickshaws, the driver’s seat

is often occupied by three persons.

. An entire family (minimum four persons)

riding a scooter/motorcycle without

realizing that this is a traffic offence and

such travel is at the risk of their lives;

. Haphazard parking of auto-rickshaws,

vehicles and government buses.

. Over-speeding, crossing the yellow line

or violating traffic rules by

scooter/motorcycle;

. Violation of traffic signals on a one-way

road or complete violation of the traffic

signal;

. “Jam-packed” or extremely crowded

stage carriages;

. Confiscation of Vehicles fitted with LPG

cylinders which are meant for home

kitchen, and arrest and prosecution the

owners/drivers of such vehicles;

. Installation of weigh bridges at all entry

and exist points to and from a city as

well as toll collection centres to keep

overloading of vehicles under check;

. Round-the-clock mobile court/mobile

policing of roads, not limited to peak

hours.

. Digging of roads by various public utility

agencies, like Telephone or Electricity

Page 17

Corporations, causing inconvenience to

road-users.

. Common traffic violations such as

driving in the wrong direction, breaching

speed limits, and jumping traffic lights.”

11. Apart from seeking appropriate directions in the light of

the above suggestions, the petitioner also seeks the

constitution of a monitoring agency to ensure that the said

suggestions are notified by the State Governments within a

time frame.

12. Apart from the above suggestions the erstwhile

Chairman of the Law Commission had also suggested an

amendment in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution to

enable enactment of a central legislation with regard not

only to national highways but also in respect of roads and

traffic thereon in addition to vehicles other than

mechanically propelled which as of today falls under Entry 13

of the State List.

13. Taking into account the recommendations and

suggestions contained in the above reports of the Working

Page 18

Groups and the other publications and views referred to, the

petitioner has contended that in the larger interest of the

members of the public using the national highways, the State

highways and all other arterial roads that connect the

different places and centres of the country the suggestions

offered by the petitioner would be worthy of consideration for

incorporation in the firm directions of this Court under Article

142 pending the necessary enactment thereof by means of

appropriate legislation by the Union and the States wherever

required. The core of the said suggestions are as follows:

(a) Owing to the severity of the problem and the

fragmented nature of responsibility of the

concerned Ministries/departments, the PMO should

have direct responsibility. There should be a

central coordinating body under the PM’s direct

leadership with order it and powers and definite

targets.

(b) Directions to ensure:

(i) Liability of IRDA in case person is denied

treatment due to delay in sanction of

insurance money.

Page 19

(ii) Equal, if not higher, compensation to

those persons injured as is given to

those who have died as a result of the

RTA.

(iii) All vehicles must have compulsory thirdparty

insurance.

Currently,

22%

vehicles

are

uninsured.

(iv) Liability for emergency expenditures of

injured, so that the injured/their family

do not have to take recourse to touts.

violations, since every traffic violation is a potential

RTA. R-2 should maintain a minimum number of

traffic policemen – as per the road conditions and

population – in a region. It must ensure that such

personnel are not diverted for any other reason

(such as ‘bandobust’).

(d) Annual vehicular inspection should be made

compulsory by R-1. Such inspection should involve

the manufacturers of the vehicles also as they

possess the requisite knowhow of the particular

vehicle. R-1 should be directed to ensure that

roads are used for transportation alone and not

Page 20

other purposes such as hawking, religious

processions, marriages etc.

(e) Road safety education should be incorporated in

school curricula and inculcated in every citizen.

(f) Directions to R-1 regarding licensing:

(i) There should be a cap on the number of

licenses that can be issued by the concerned

official in one day, so that every application

for a license is strictly checked and

evaluated. Petitioner suggests a cap of four

licenses issuable per official per day.

(ii) Prescribe minimum education and

qualification standards for drivers.

(iii) Test the knowledge of safety standards, roads

rules, signboards, road markings etc. in

addition to mere ability to drive. Licenses

ought not to be issued, as presently done, on

the basis of the criteria of ability to drive

alone.

(iv) Licensing should be based on biometrics to

prevent multiple licenses issued to one

person.

Page 21

(v) Computerized licensing to track offences and

introduce a point-based penalty system for

offenders.

(vi) Bar coding of vehicles and licenses to link to

the penalty system, the annual fitness

certificate of the vehicle, and insurance forms

for instant information.

(vii) Restrictions on the number of new vehicles

registered and number of vehicles a

family/person can own, methods to ensure

road-worthiness of vehicle, periodic license

renewal etc.

13. The Respondent No. 1, namely Ministry of Road

Transport & Highways (MoRTH) has filed a detailed counter

affidavit in the case highlighting the steps undertaken by the

Ministry as well as other associated Ministries/Departments

of the Union to combat the challenge posed by the huge

number of road accidents that occur throughout the length

and breath of the road network in the country. The contents

of the said affidavit will have to be noted in some detail to

comprehend the steps that have been undertaken and also

Page 22

the plans and schemes that have been evolved or are in the

process of being evolved as possible answers to the problem.

(a) According to Respondent No. 1, on 15.03.2010 the

Government of India has approved the National Road

Safety Policy. The salient features of the said Policy are:

“…… promoting awareness, establishing road

safety information data base, encouraging

safer road infrastructure including application

of intelligent transport, enforcement of safety

laws etc.”

(b) The National Road Safety Council as contemplated

under Section 215 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

(hereinafter for short ‘the Act’) has been constituted by

the Respondent No. 1 and advisories have been issued

to the States to set up Safety Councils at the State and

District levels. The functions of the National Council set

up under the Act are:

“The Councils and Committees referred to in

this section shall discharge such functions

relating to the road safety programmes as the

Central Government or the State Government,

as the case may be, may, having regard to the

objects of the Act, specify.”

Page 23

penalties for different offences has been passed by the

Upper House on 8.5.2012 and the Bill is presently

pending before the Lok Sabha. So far as overloading of

vehicles, a major cause of road accidents, is concerned,

according to the Union, the enforcement of the law in

this regard is the responsibility of the State

Governments. 27 States, according to Respondent No.

1, have taken necessary action for enforcement of the

provisions of Section 114 of the Act. Similarly,

enforcement of the provisions contained in Section 129

of the Act regarding wearing of helmets and Rule 125(1)

of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (hereinafter

for short ‘the Rules’) with regard to seat belts etc. is the

responsibility of the State Governments. According to

the respondent No. 1, in collaboration with NIC, a

national register as well as State registers have been

created to act as a centralized database for driving

licenses and registration certificates. Furthermore, it is

stated that “out of 993 RTOs, 992 RTOs have been

connected with State registers/national register through

VPNoBB/LL connectivity and RTOs/DTOs data is being

replicated at State Register/National Register in

Asynchronous Mode. The National and State Registers

are customized with portal VAHAN & SARATHI software

for compiling/ digitizing the data on DLs and RCs

Page 24

respectively. State Transport Departments and

Enforcement agencies have been provided access to

the data on National Register and State Registers.”

(d) Insofar as fitness certificates for commercial vehicles

under Section 56 of the Act is concerned, according to

the Respondent No. 1, it is the States who are

responsible for issuing fitness certificates to commercial

vehicles. However the Ministry (MoRTH) has designed

model inspection and certification centres for effective

inspection and certification of motor vehicles from the

point view of safety and emissions. Furthermore,

according to the Ministry, the installation of model

Centres in 10 States has been planned and 9 centres

have been sanctioned till date which are at different

stages of implementation.

(e) Insofar as road engineering is concerned, according to

the Ministry, road safety has been made an integral part

of the road design and road safety audit of the selected

stretches of national highways and expressways are

being regularly conducted. Further more, according to

the Ministry, a Committee has been constituted for

formulating a National Ambulance Code which has since

been finalized. Incorporation of the said Code within the

framework of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules is under

consideration. In its counter affidavit, the Ministry has

Page 25

also stated that a Committee has been set up to make

recommendations for a National Helpline for road

accident victims based on a common toll free number

(1033) with dedicated round the clock call centres. At

the said centres, calls from the State Highways will also

be accepted and will be forwarded to the concerned

agency for providing relief.

(f) So far as road safety education is concerned, it has

been stated in the counter affidavit of the respondent

No. 1 that a syllabus in first aid has been made

compulsory in driving schools; plan are underway for

incorporating a chapter for road safety for school

children and a book called “Sign Language” containing

a chapter on helping road accident victims has been

published and circulated in adequate number to all

State Government schools as well as schools affiliated

to the CBSE.

(g) Dealing with the issue of compulsory insurance the

Ministry has stated that under Section 146 of the Act

there is a prohibition on use of a motor vehicle which

has not been insured. According to the Ministry it has

issued a Circular dated 20.6.2013 to all State

Governments to enforce the aforesaid provision of the

Act.

Page 26

(h) Insofar as licensing and prescription of minimum

education and qualification for drivers is concerned,

according to the Ministry, adequate provisions exist

under the Act as well as the Rules. So far as

enforcement thereof is concerned, according to the

Ministry, a Committee has been set up to recommend

staffing norms for the office of Motor Licensing Officers.

Further more, according to the first respondent, setting

up of adequate number of Institute of Driving Training &

Research (IDTR) and Regional Driving Training Schools

(RDTs) is contemplated and plans are also afoot to link

these centres with the jurisdictional RTO for conducting

necessary tests before issuing driving licenses.

(i) Refresher training course for heavy vehicle drivers are

being organized to inculcate safe driving habits and to

acquaint the drivers with the rules to be followed while

using the roads.

(j) Publicity measures and awareness campaign of road

safety is carried out through DAVP, Doordarshan, All

India Radio and newspapers and a suitably designed

system throughout the country for rigorous inspection of

motor vehicles and to remove the defects before they

are allowed to ply on roads is under contemplation;

necessary amendments in the Central Motor Vehicles

Rules would be carried out prescribing these tests which

Page 27

will replace the presently visual inspection of vehicles

which is in force.

(k) Insofar as post-accident medical response is concerned,

it is stated that the Ministry of Health and Family

Welfare (MoHFW) has established trauma centres in

State Government hospitals to the extent possible and

during the 11

Plan the MoHFW had identified 140

government hospitals in 16 States along the golden

quadrilateral highway for establishing trauma care

facilities. The scheme is proposed to be extended to

another 85 government hospitals during the 12

Plan

and such facilities will be located near or on the national

highways.

(l) A pilot project has been introduced along a stretch of

NH-8 between Delhi and Jaipur wherein 11 ambulances

had been deployed at intervals of 20 kilometers and the

government has undertaken to bear the treatment cost

upto Rs. 30,000/- for the initial 48 hours. A National

Highway Accident Relief Service Scheme (NHARSS) has

also been launched to provide immediate eviction of

injured victims to the nearest medical aid centre and

adequate number of cranes of different capacities,

ambulances and life-support ambulances to carry the

victims to 140 identified hospitals had been provided in

different States. 24 interceptors have been sanctioned

Page 28

to the States and Union Territories to detect violations

under the Act. In the counter affidavit filed by the first

respondent it is also stated that following the decision of

the Supreme Court in Pt. Parmanand Katara vs.

Union of India

instructions have been issued by the

Ministry to all the State Governments emphasising the

need for providing medical aid to road accident victims

without waiting for the police for completion of the legal

formalities. Reference is made to a circular dated

19.02.2004 issued to all State Governments regarding

the necessity of building confidence in the public for

helping road accident victims. In the said circular it is

emphasized that the members of the public, who render

voluntary help to persons injured in accidents, should

not be unnecessarily questioned and detained in the

police stations and further that they should not be

harassed or forced to give their particulars.

14. There are several other significant aspects connected

with the present matter that have been highlighted by the

Ministry (MoRTH). The National Road Safety and Traffic

Management Board Bill 2010 for creation of a National Road

Safety and Traffic Management Board (NRSTMB) has been

emphasised. The said Board is intended to act as a lead

(1989) 4 SCC 286

Page 29

agency to oversee road safety and traffic management

activities in the country. The functions of the Board as

stipulated in the Bill include specification of standards for

construction and maintenance of national highways;

specifying the safety standards for mechanically propelled

vehicles; to maintain a comprehensive database on road

safety; to issue guidelines for training and testing of drivers;

establishment and upgradation of trauma centres in

consultation with the Directorate General of Health Services.

At present, the Bill is pending before the Lok Sabha though

the Parliamentary Standing Committee has recommended

scrapping of the same on the ground that the Board is

merely a recommendatory body and is a further addition to

the several other existing bodies acting in an advisory and

recommendatory capacity.

15. The proposed substitution of Section 163A and the

Second Schedule to the Act which has been approved by the

Rajya Sabha on 8.5.2012 has also been highlighted in the

Page 30

affidavit as a move to ensure payment of higher/substantial

compensation to victims of road accidents.

The Bill amends sub-section (3) of Section 163A

permitting the Government to revise the amount or

multiplier specified in the Second Schedule every three

years, based on the cost of living and rise in price index.

The corresponding sub-section in the principal Act permitted

the Government to do so “from time to time”.

The Bill replaces the Second Schedule to lay down a

new scheme for calculating the compensation amount

payable to a victim or his/her kin. The formula for working

out compensation is as follows:

(a) The proven annual income of the victim is to be

worked out.

(b) Appropriate multiplier (higher of the multiplier

based on the age of the victim and the age of the

surviving/dependent parents/spouse/children) to

be applied.

Page 31

appropriate multiplier to arrive at compensation

amount, subject to following namely:-

(i) The amount of compensation payable for

Permanent Total Disablement as defined in

Schedule I of the Workmen’s Compensation Act,

1923 (8 of 1923) shall be determined by

application of appropriate multiplier to proved

income, subject to maximum of Rs.10 lakhs.

(ii) The amount of compensation so arrived shall

be reduced by 1/3

in respect of fatal accidents

(reduction of 1/3

represents living expenses for

deceased person, had he been alive).

The maximum annual income for calculation of

compensation is proposed to be fixed at Rs.1 lakh as against

the present amount of Rs.40,000/-. The minimum

compensation amount payable is increased to Rs.1 lakh from

the erstwhile Rs.50,000/-. In case of death of non-earning

person, the Schedule fixes the compensation at Rs.1 lakh for

children upto 5 years of age, and at Rs.1.5 lakh for persons

more than 5 years of age. Where such a person is grievously

injured in an accident, the maximum compensation that may

Page 32

be awarded is Rs.50,000/-. In case of non-grievous injuries,

the non-earning person may be awarded a maximum

compensation of Rs.20,000/-. The Bill also seeks to enhance

the general damages payable in case of death and disability.

16. Finally, in its counter affidavit, the Ministry (MoRTH) has

stated that the enforcement of the core provisions of the Act

comes within the purview of the States/Union Territories and

though the first respondent has been impressing upon all

States/Union Territories for strict enforcement of the

provisions of the Act by issuing advisories from time to time,

eventually, it is upto the States to respond appropriately in

the matter.

17. The narration above indicates the enormity of the

problem; the issues connected therewith; the suggestions

made in different quarters for resolution and the attempts to

provide a solution. The mosaic of facts, information and

suggestions have been laid only to serve as a basis to

undertake the exercise imminently necessary to resolve the

issue, to the extent possible, so far as the present is

Page 33

concerned and to visualise what could be the requirements

of the future. We wish to make it clear that the exercise

attempted cannot be considered to be either infallible or to

be a one time attempt at a permanent solution. Different

facets of the issue with new complexities are bound to recur

from time to time requiring renewed attempts at resolution.

It is keeping in mind the above features that the course that

we intend to charter, as laid out in the paragraphs

hereinafter, has been visualized and conceptualized.

18. The total network of roads in India is approximately 47

lakhs kilometers which is possibly the second largest

network in the world after the U.S.A. While Express

Highways count for only 200 kilometers in length,

National Highways measure 70,934 kilometers; State

Highways 1,63,896 kilometers; other PWD Roads

10,05,327 kilometers and rural and other roads

27,49,805 kilometers. The statistics mentioned below

would indicate the relative position with regard to the

extent of road network; the vehicular population and

Page 34

the number of deaths that had occurred in the past

years in road accidents in India and other countries like

U.S.A., U.K., China etc. While the statistics available in

respect of the USA may reflect a higher rate of

accidents though a lower number of deaths (possibly

due to more advanced after trauma facilities) the

figures in respect of the U.K. and China highlights the

magnitude of the problem in so far as India is

concerned. In this regard it would require a specific

mention that while the death rate in China, which had

stood at par with India at a certain point of time, has

shown a significant downward trend in case of India the

said figures has shown a disturbing increase.

Country Road

network

India

Source:

“Accidental

Deaths & Suicides

in India, 2010”,

National Crime

Records Bureau.

(km)

A - Data on RTAs

Number of

vehicles

Number of

Accidents

Deaths Seri

ous

inju

ries

46,89,842 11,49,53,000 4,30,654 1,26,896 4,66

,600

Page 35

Year: 2009

USA

Source:

US Census Bureau

Year: 2009

Source:

Department for

Transport

Year: 2009

China

Source:

“Global Status

Report on road

safety, 2013”,

WHO.

Year: 2010

Brazil

Source:

“Global Status

Report on road

safety, 2013”,

WHO.

Year: 2010

65,86,610 25,41,66,000 1,08,00,000 33,808 22,1

7,00

3,94,428 3,42,00,000 1,64,000 2,222 2,20,

000

41,06,387 20,70,61,286 -- 70,134 --

15,80,964 6,48,17,974 -- 37,594 --

B – Data of relative figures in respect of China & India

Number of Road Accidents

Year China India

2004 5,17,889 4,29,910

Source: “Statistical Year Book of India – 2014” published by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme

Implementation.

Page 36

2005 4,50,254 4,39,255

2006 3,78,781 4,60,920

2007 3,27,209 4,79,216

2008 2,65,204 4,84,704

2009 2,38,351 4,86,384

Number of Persons Killed

Year China India

2004 1,07,077 92,618

2005 98,738 94,968

2006 89,455 1,05,749

2007 81,649 1,14,444

2008 73,484 1,19,860

2009 67,759 1,25,660

19. The facts mentioned above would leave no room for

doubt that Indian roads have proved to be giant killers

demanding immediate attention and remedial action. Such

attention and necessary intervention, in the first instance, is

required to be made by the concerned governmental

agencies. While there is no reason for any skepticism over

the abundant concern shown by all concerned to the issues

highlighted and also the attempted solutions both in the field

of law enforcement as well as amendments in the law,

besides limited experiments in providing better after trauma

care, for reasons that need not detain the court, the results

so far have not been very encouraging. The accident and

Page 37

casualty graphs continue to run on an even keel over the last

several years.

20. An accident is an incident that happens unexpectedly

and unintentionally. It is occasioned either by human failure

or human negligence. Viewed from the above perspective

and also thorough hindsight every road accident is an

avoidable happening. The history of humankind has been

one of conquests over the inevitable. The resignation to fate

has never been the accepted philosophy of human life.

Challenges have to be met to make human life more

meaningful. This is how the constitutional philosophy behind

Article 21 has been evolved by the Indian courts over a long

period of time. It is this process of development and the

absence of significant and meaningful results from the

governmental action till date that impels us to delve into the

realms of the issues highlighted by Dr. Rajaseekaran in the

present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution.

21. Having considered all the relevant facts and also the

suggestions that have come from the different quarters it

Page 38

appears to us that the four-dimensional approach that the

Government had earlier attempted by setting up four

different working groups to go into the four issues of road

safety, namely, enforcement, engineering, education and

emergency care would be the best manner to approach the

issues arising. We, therefore, intend to adopt the same in

the exercise proposed to be undertaken.

Enforcement

22. Enforcement of the existing laws, regulations and norms

having a bearing on road safety can be conveniently sub-

divided into different categories like-

(i) licensing;

(ii) certification of fitness of vehicles;

(iii) limits of use of vehicles i.e. passenger carrying

capacity, weight carrying capacity etc.;

(iv) use of road safety devices;

(v) adherence to norms including user of roads,

and;

Page 39

(vi) deployment of adequate manpower for

enforcement of the existing provisions of law.

23. The provisions of the law i.e. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

governing the aforesaid features of the matter can now be

taken note of.

A. Licensing

24. (I) Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 states

that no person shall drive a motor vehicle in a public place

without holding a valid driving license. As per the mandate

of Section 6, a person cannot hold more than one such

license. Further, Section 4 sets the age limits for driving of

motor vehicles: 18 years for cars, 16 years for motorcycles,

and 20 years for transport vehicles. Section 5 prohibits the

owner to permit any person to drive the vehicle without

satisfying Sections 3 & 4. If an owner permits any person to

drive the vehicle without a driving licence, the owner is liable

for imprisonment upto 3 months or fine upto Rs. 1,000 or

both, under Section 180.

Page 40

(II) Under Section 19, the licensing authority may

disqualify a person from holding a driving license for certain

reasons, such as if the person (i) is a habitual criminal or

habitual drunkard, (ii) is a habitual addict to any narcotic

drug or psychotropic substance within the meaning of the

NDPS Act, 1985, (iii) is using or has used a motor vehicle in

the commission of a cognizable offence, (iv) has by his

previous conduct as driver of a motor vehicle shown that his

driving is likely to be attended with danger to the public, (v)

has committed any such act which is likely to cause nuisance

or danger to the public, etc.

(III) The Court may also disqualify a person from

holding a driving license, apart from imposing any other

punishment. In the following cases, disqualification by the

Court is mandatory under Section 20(2):

- not stopping the vehicle when required to do so by any

Police Officer (not below the rank of Police SubInspector

uniform)

the

vehicle

involved

road

accident

(Section

132)

Page 41

- not shifting the victim of the accident in which his or her

vehicle is involved to the nearest hospital/ medical

practitioner (Section 134)

- not giving, on demand by a Police Officer, any

information required by him (Section 134)

- not reporting the occurrence of accident to insurer

(Section 134)

- driving by a drunken person or by a person under the

influence of drugs (Section 185)

- driving dangerously (Section 184)

- racing and trials of speed (Section 189)

- using a vehicle without registration (Section 192)

B. Vehicular Fitness

25. (I) Under Section 39, a person cannot drive a motor

vehicle or cause or permit his vehicle to be driven without

proper registration and display of the registration mark. If a

vehicle is not in a fit condition to be used on the public road

or is being used for hire without valid permit, the appropriate

Page 42

authority under Section 53 can suspend the registration

certificate.

(II) Using a vehicle without registration can result in

fine, the minimum amount of which is Rs. 2,000 and

maximum is Rs. 5,000, under Section 192. For a subsequent

offence, the maximum amount of fine may extend to Rs.

10,000, subject to a minimum of Rs. 5,000. The punishment

is not applicable for vehicles used in an emergency for the

conveyance of persons suffering from sickness or injuries or

for the transportation of food or material to relieve distress or

of medical supplies for a like purpose, per sub-Section (2).

(III) A vehicle cannot be used on the road without

proper insurance certificate, as under Section 146. The

owner is responsible for obtaining insurance. Driving an

uninsured vehicle can result in punishment in imprisonment

upto 3 months or fine upto Rs. 1000/- or both, under Section

196.

Page 43

(IV) In cases of vehicles involved in road accidents,

the driver or owner must report such involvement to the

concerned police officer. Failure to do so would attract

punishment under Section 187, viz. imprisonment upto 3

months or fine upto Rs. 500, or both (in addition to the

punishment for the accident). For the subsequent offence

under this section, the imprisonment can be upto 6 months

and fine amount upto Rs. 1,000. Moreover, such a vehicle

has to be inspected by the authorized officer of the Motor

Vehicles Department (Section 136).

(V) Chapter V of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules,

1989 contains exhaustive provisions on the construction,

maintenance and equipment of motor vehicles, dealing the

dimensions of the vehicle, tyres, brakes, steering gears,

safety glass, windscreen wipers, emission standards, noise

reduction measures, and speed governors. The Rules also

provide for the installation of devices such as helmets, safety

belts, padded dashboards etc. for the safety of drivers,

passengers and road users. Violation of the standards

Page 44

prescribed in relation to road safety, control of noise and air

pollution is fine amount upto Rs.1,000/- for the first offence

and Rs. 2,000/- for the subsequent offence, under Section

190 of the MV Act.

C. Use of Roads

26. (I) The MV Act contains several provisions regulating

the use of roads by motor vehicles.

(II) Section 119 mandates every driver to drive the

vehicle in conformity with traffic signs and prescribed

driving regulations and to comply with all the directions

given to him by any Police Officer engaged in the regulation

of traffic. Under Section 121, the driver must signal his

intention to stop or take a left or right turn.

(III) Leaving a vehicle at rest on any public place in

such a way as to cause or likely to cause danger, obstruction

or undue inconvenience to other road users is an offence

under Section 122. Such vehicles may be towed away by

Police and the owner may be charged for towing in addition

Page 45

to the penalty for offence. A vehicle may also be towed away

by the police (in uniform) if it is left attended in a public place

for more than 10 hours, or parked at a ‘No Parking Zone’, or

parked in a manner that creates a traffic hazard (Section

127).

(IV) Carrying more than one pillion rider on a two-

wheeler is an offence under Section 128. Wearing a helmet

of ISI standard, while riding a motor cycle in a public place, is

mandatory under Section 129.

(V) Under Section 183, if a driver of a motor vehicle

contravenes the speed limit, he/she shall be punishable

with fine upto Rs. 400/- for the first offence and Rs. 500/- for

the subsequent offence, and if the owner causes the driver to

contravene the speed limit, he/she shall be punishable with

fine upto Rs. 300/- for the first offence and Rs. 500/- for

subsequent offence. Under Section 184, whoever drives a

motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner which is dangerous

to the public, having regard to all the circumstances of the

case including nature, condition and use of the place where

Page 46

the vehicle is driven and the amount of traffic which actually

is at the time or which might reasonably be expected to be in

the place, shall be punishable for the first offence with

imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or

with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees. In case

of repeated offence committed within three years of the first

offence, he may be punished with imprisonment for a term

which may extend to two years or with fine which may

extend to two thousand rupees or with both. The driver can

be arrested on the spot. Taking part in a race or trial of

speed of any kind without the Government’s written

permission is punishable under Section 189, with

imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or

with a fine upto Rs 500 or with both.

(VI) Under Section 185, punishment for drunken

driving is imprisonment upto 2 years or fine upto Rs. 3,000/-

or both, and the driver can be arrested on the spot. Further,

Section 186 makes a person who is mentally or physically

unfit to drive, punishable for the first offence of driving in

Page 47

such a situation with fine upto Rs. 200/- and Rs. 500/- for

subsequent offence.

(VII) Driving a vehicle exceeding permissible

weight can result in a punishment of Rs. 2,000/- and an

additional amount of Rs. 1,000/- per ton of excess load

together with the liability to pay charges of off-loading the

excess load, per Section 194.

(VIII) Using vehicle in contravention of permit

condition can result in fine upto Rs. 5,000/- but not less than

Rs. 2,000/- for the first offence and imprisonment upto 1 year

but not less than 3 months or with fine amount upto Rs.

10,000/- but not less than Rs. 5,000/- or both for the

subsequent offence (Section 192(a)).

27. While improvements in different spheres of law are

imminent with passage of time, any change of law has to be

preceded by serious debate and consideration of a wide

variety of factors all of which takes time. The legislative

procedure is also time consuming. In fact several

Page 48

amendments in the Motor Vehicles Act as indicated in the

earlier part of this order are under consideration. While such

changes or amendments can be brought in only upon

completion of the necessary exercise, the enforcement of the

existing laws would stand on an entirely different footing.

Strict and faithful enforcement of all existing laws and norms

must be insisted upon not only as an absolute principle of law

but also for the huge beneficial effects thereof. As noted

earlier, out of the total road network in the country which is

about 47 lakhs kilometers in length, national highways

account for only 70,934 kilometers only. It is over these

national highways that the executive power of the Union

extends whereas in respect of the State highways and other

State roads the Executive power of the State runs. That

apart, roads, traffic thereon and vehicles other than those

mechanically driven are covered by relevant entries in List II

of the Seventh Schedule giving jurisdiction to the States both

in matters of legislation and exercise of executive power.

None of the States are parties to the present writ petition.

Though we are inclined to accept that directions to the

Page 49

States to enforce the existing laws can be issued even in

their absence, we cannot help observing that the matter

cannot be allowed to rest merely by issuance of directions by

this Court. Observance and implementation of the directions

to be issued by this Court in exercise of power under Article

142 of the Constitution would require a continuing scrutiny

and we intend to monitor such implementation and to make

the States accountable for any inaction or lapse in this

regard. We, therefore, implead all the States as party

respondents and direct the Registry to issue notice to them.

For the present we direct the Government of each State to

effectively implement and enforce all the provisions of the

Act in respect of which the States have the authority and

obligation to so act under the Constitution in addition to the

tasks specifically alluded to in the subsequent paragraphs of

the present order.

Engineering

Page 50

28. In so far as road engineering is concerned, the

concerned departments in the Central Government as well as

the State Governments must make road safety an integral

part of road design at the planning stage and conduct

regular road safety audit of selected stretches of

expressways, national highways, state highways and other

state roads to identify what can be reasonably termed as

‘black spots’ i.e. problem spots where a large number of

accidents occur. Regular maintenance of all highways and

roads both by the Central and the State Governments, in

order to make the same traffic worthy, is the minimum that

the citizens of this country can expect and are entitled to.

We hardly need to emphasis that it is the duty of the Central

and the State Governments to ensure the availability of safe

roads worthy of traffic, though we must hasten to add that

our observations in this regard must necessarily be

understood in the context of the resources available to the

Central and the State Governments. We accordingly direct

the respective Governments to act accordingly.

Education

Page 51

29. The importance of education on road safety cannot be

gainsaid. Such consciousness needs to be developed

amongst all citizens and should be inculcated from a young

age. The importance of informing and educating the citizens

of the virtues of road safety lies in the fact that, in the last

resort, it is such realization alone that can lead to better and

safer use of roads and vehicles. It is heartening to note that

serious consideration on this aspect of road safety has been

expended by the Union Government details of which

measure have been noted earlier. We direct the Union

Government to continue to expend its efforts and all such

measures shall also be implemented by the State

Governments.

Emergency

30. In so far as emergency is concerned there is perhaps no

denial of the fact that many deaths and loss of limbs and

serious disfiguration of victims can be saved by timely

medical attention. Lack of adequate number of good

Page 52

samaritans; squabbles between police stations and

administrative authorities over jurisdiction; lack of quick

response in removing the victims to hospitals and centres of

medical care due to lack of necessary infrastructure like

ambulances; absence of adequate and well spread out

number of hospitals and medical centres; the poor condition

and lack of adequate infrastructure in government run

hospitals and health centres and the prohibitive costs of

health care facilities in the more advanced centres of

medical care besides insistence of large deposit of money by

such advanced health care centres in the private sectors are

some of the problems that have seriously plagued post

trauma/accident care in the country. As already noted,

limited attempts have been made on experimental basis and

that too on national highways alone to provide better

amenities and also to take care of the fund requirements for

the first 48 hours following the accident. The experiment

needs to be extended by the Central Government to more

stretches of the National Highways besides introduction and

Page 53

implementation of such measures by the States in the roads

under their control and jurisdiction.

31. The sum total of the discussions above is that all

existing laws and norms including the provisions of the Motor

Vehicles Act, as in force, are required to be implemented in

the right earnest and with all vigour by the authorities of the

Union and the State Governments who are responsible for

such implementation. In so far as suitable amendments to

the laws are concerned, this Court can only hope and trust

that all such changes or amendments which are presently

under legislative consideration would be expedited and

measures as may be considered necessary by legislature in

its collective wisdom will be brought in the statute book in

due course. At the same time, what has been admitted to be

necessary and, therefore, has been initiated by the Central

Government in so far as engineering and road education is

concerned shall be implemented and directions to so act

may be construed to have been issued by this Court by the

present order. Similarly, in so far as emergency care is

Page 54

concerned, what has been initiated by the Central

Government, as stated in its affidavit, shall be suitably

implemented and extended subject to the limits of its

financial ability. The States also shall act accordingly and

initiate similar measures if required, in a phased manner.

32. We are aware that the journey that has been undertaken

would be long and arduous. It is difficult to visualise when

the same would end, if at all. To ensure the success of

the process undertaken, constant supervision of this Court

of the measures undertaken by the Central Government

and the State Governments and the extent of affirmative

action on part of the Union and the States will have to be

measured and monitored by the Court from time to time.

Keeping in mind that the time available to this Court is

limited we deem it proper to constitute a Committee to

undertake the process of monitoring on behalf of the

Court. The Committee will have the following composition

and shall function in the manner indicated below:

Composition of Committee

Page 55

Sl.No. Name

Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan

Judge, Supreme Court of India

(Effective from 15

Mr. S. Sundar

May, 2014)

Chairperson

Distinguished Fellow, TERI

Former Secretary, Ministry of Surface

Transport, Government of India

Dr. (Mrs.) Nishi Mittal

Ex. Chief Scientist, CRRI,

Formerly HoD, Traffic Engineering and

Safety (TES),

Central Road Research Institute

Member

33. (I) The composition of the above Committee will be

notified by the Ministry of Road Transport and

Highways, Government of India forthwith.

(II) The Committee will have its office in the

national capital and requisite infrastructure including

manpower will be provided by the Central

Government.

(III) The remuneration and perquisites of the

Chairman of the Committee and its members will be

fixed by the Union Government in consultation with

the individual concerned and in accordance with

prevailing norms.

(IV) All State Governments as well as different

Ministries/Departments/Wings of the Central

Page 56

Government who are currently looking after the

multi-dimensional issues pertaining to road

safety will submit their first report to the

Committee within three months from today

indicating the state of implementation and

enforcement of all laws pertaining to (i)

licensing; (ii) certification of fitness of vehicles;

(iii) limits of use of vehicles i.e. passenger

carrying capacity, weight carrying capacity etc.;

(iv) use of road safety devices; (v) adherence to

norms including user of roads, and (vi)

deployment of adequate manpower for

enforcement of the existing provisions of law.

(V) The Union Government as well as the State

Government shall also indicate their views on

the necessity of further change in the law, if

any.

(VI) The Union Government as well as the

Government of the States shall also offer their

views on the suggestions/recommendations of

the different bodies/persons noticed and

mentioned in the present order which are

presently not under implementation.

Page 57

(VII) The Committee shall undertake a detailed

scrutiny and examination of the Report(s) that

may be submitted and the views of the Central

and State Governments with regard to necessity

of further legislation or changes in the existing

laws.

(VIII) The Committee will submit its report to this

Court within three months after receipt of report

from the Union and the State Governments

indicating and expressing its views on each of

the matters referred to in the present order

including the deficiencies and the defaults on

the part of any of the stakeholders, as may be

found.

34. The matter be posted for further consideration before

this Court on the expiry of six months from today along

with the report (s) as may be submitted pursuant to the

present order.

Page 58

35. A copy of this order be furnished to the petitioner and

each of the Respondents as well as to the Chief

Secretaries of all the States/Union Territories.

NEW DELHI,

APRIL 22, 2014.

...…………………………CJI.

[P. SATHASIVAM]

.........………………………J.

[RANJAN GOGOI]

…..........……………………J.

[N.V. RAMANA]

Page 59

"Loved reading this piece by Vineet Kumar?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"

Join our Telegram group

Join our Whatsapp group

Published in Civil Law
Views : 4134

Report Abuse

Previous

Next

Comments