What Is The Issue
- Legal journalists Areeb Uddin Ahmed (Bar & Bench) and Sparsh Upadhyay (Live Law), as well as three law students, filed a PIL seeking public access to virtual courts.
- Shashwat Anand, lawyer for the petitioner, sought the Court to order that no coercive action be taken against journalists who live report the court's proceedings.
- Swapnil Tripathi & Ors. v. Supreme Court of India & Ors. Was taken as a reference. The administration is working on the Live Streaming component, according to Advocate Anand, but the Petitioners' main issue is Live Reporting.” He argued that live reporting should be permitted.
- He said that the Supreme Court has also added a feature to its mobile app that allows journalists to receive links to virtual sessions.
What Is The Rebuttal
- The court said, “No one is disputing your right.” The Chairman of the Supreme Court's E-Committee has sent instructions for live streaming to the Chief Justice of the High Court, and recommendations have been requested. It will require some time.
- Also, the concern of the app was addressed by the High Court’s Counsel saying administration is considering a switch from Jitsi Meet App to some other commercial platform, which will address all the concerns as raised in this petition.
What do you think about the petition? Let us know in the comment section below!
"Loved reading this piece by Navya Chaturvedi?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"