BCI Decides To Keep In Abeyance 'Criticism-Disqualification Rules' For Review
The Bar Council of India has decided to formulate a committee to review the recently inserted Sections V and V-A of Chapter II of Part VI of the Bar Council of India Rules and has decided to keep the rules in abeyance till the report is received. The Bench declared the sections unconstitutional.
This rule had drawn a lot of attention because of the criticism it faced.
Do you think the Bench took the right decision?
Mention in the comments below!
Delhi HC Refuses To Hear Plea Seeking Internal Assessment Criteria For CBSE Class 10
The Delhi High Court refused to hear any plea pertaining to a direction to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to publish the rationale document on Class X assessment criteria. They clearly stated that Litigation will not be an option here at all.
Do you think this was a fair decision made by the Delhi High Court?
Mention in the comments below!
Experimental Door-To-Door Vaccination To Be Conducted In Maharashtra Without Seeking Centre’s Approval, Bombay High Court
Based on the recent judgment of Dhruti Kapadia & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., the government of Maharashtra stated that they will not wait for the Centre’s approval for the door-to-door vaccination distribution. This will be totally on an experimental basis for the elderly people and the people with any sort of disability.
Was the State government powerful enough to take this decision on their own?
Mention in the comments below!
Allahabad High Court Directs Uttar Pradesh Govt. To Reply In Two Weeks On Defects In Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination
The Uttar Pradesh government has been directed to state a reply within two weeks on the defects that were in the question paper for the Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination. Not only where the questions out of syllabus, but the options provided were also wrong.
Is this such a serious matter that the Allahabad High Court had to interfere?
Mention in the comments below!
Constitutional Validity Of The Tamil Nadu Land Acqusition Act, 2019 Upheld By The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court bench struck down the law as being ‘unconstitutional, illegal and void’ on Tuesday. This was to be applied from 2013 retrospectively. Even after a lot of petitions and debates, this decision was taken.
Do you agree with the bench of the Supreme Court?
Mention in the comments below!
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
