As soon as the government counsel sought two months to reply to the PIL, saying that the chief secretary had made the request, chief justice Mukul Mudgal asked whether “the haryanachief secretary was trying to run the courts?” Mudgal then directed the counsel to file a reply by February 4.
The court also wondered how Rathore kept getting promotions while policemen with minor complaints against them were denied promotions. The chief justice gave an example of how a constable was not given promotion because a complaint was pending.
During the hearing, Rathore’s wife and counsel Abha asked whether the matter could be decided before the criminal appeal against conviction comes up for hearing.
Rathore said the contents of the writ petition and the criminal appeal filed against the conviction were related.“The pendency of the PIL before the high court would prejudice the decision in the appeal,” Abha stated.
Centre wants CBSE to act
The Centre wants the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to take action against
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
Views 920 Report