LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

SC miffed over AP response in top Maoist killing row

The Supreme Court has expressed displeasure at the lack of seriousness shown by Andhra Pradesh govt in dealing with the allegation that top Maoist leader Azad and journalist Hemchandra Pandey were killed in a fake encounter by the state police.

A bench of justice Aftab Alam and R M Lodha on Monday, while declining to grant four weeks of adjournment sought by the state government, directed it to file its affidavit by 28th March.

"You are not showing the seriousness in dealing with the issue. We are not inclined to grant you such a long adjournment," the bench said while passing the direction.

At the earlier hearing on 14th January while issuing notice to the state and the Centre, the apex court had observed "we cannot allow the Republic killing its own children."

The bench had issued notices to the Centre and the AP government on a petition filed by social activist Swami Agnivesh and Pandey's 30-year-old widow Babita seeking a judicial probe into the controversial killings six months ago.

Seeking the replies by the Centre and the AP government to the notices within six weeks, the bench said "we hope there will be an answer. There will be a good and convincing answer."

"The government will have to answer so many questions," the Supreme Court had said.

Cherukuri Rajkumar alias Azad, a senior member of banned CPI (Maoist) Central Committee, and Pandey, who was dubbed by the police as a Maoist, were killed in an alleged fake encounter on the intervening night of July 1-2, 2010, in Adilabad district of Andhra Pradesh close to Maharashtra.

Seeking a judicial probe into the killings, the petition alleged that the post-mortem reports of both the persons and a fact-finding exercise carried out by rights groups clearly indicate that the encounter was not genuine.

The petitioners referred to the fact-finding carried out by Coordination of Democratic Rights Organisations (CDRO), a national coalition of human rights organisations, that both were killed by the Andhra Pradesh Police in blatant violation of their rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitions alleged that Azad, 58, who carried a reward of Rs 12 lakh on his head and Pandey, 32, were killed from a very close range which is evident from the post-mortem reports of both the persons.

 

"Loved reading this piece by rahul?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  589  Report



Comments
img