Ladakh Residents Move To Supreme Court Challenging Abrogation Of Article 370
Regarding the Jammu and Kashmir (Reorganisation) Act, 2019, an impleadment application has been filed by one journalist and two politicians. The plea was filed by Lok Sabha MP Mohammad Akbar Lone and Justice (retd) Hasnain Masoodi. The main contention of the plea was that the chilling effect pf the impugned Act has extinguished a ‘state’. It is stated in the plea that the Act has unconstitutionally undermined Article 370. It has taken away their right to choose their own leaders and imposed a dictatorial regime. The inhabitants are at the mercy of the inhabitants.
What do you think about this case?
SC: NCLAT/NCLT Has No Residual Equity Jurisdiction While Dealing With Resolution Plan Approved By CoC
The case was of Pratap Technocrats (P) Ltd. V. Monitoring Committee of Reliance Infratel Limited. The decision was given by Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice M R Shah. The bench upheld the orders passed by the National Company Law Appellate Authority and National Company Law Tribunal which approved the resolution plan formulated in the course of the insolvency resolution process of the corporate debtor. While dealing with the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors, there is no residual equity based jurisdiction of the adjudication or appellate authority.
What do you think about this case?
Supreme Court Imposes Fine On Political Parties Who Flouted Directions To Publish Criminal Antecedents Of Candidates In Bihar Polls
The case was of Brajesh Singh V. Sunil Arora. The decision was given by Justice R F Nariman and Justice B R Gavai. Fine was imposed by the Supreme Court on eight political parties who were guilty of contempt of court as they had failed to publish the criminal antecedents of candidates for the Bihar Assembly Polls last year. The parties involved were Communist Party of India (Marxist), Nationalist Congress Party, Bharatiya Janata Party, Indian National Congress, Janta Dal, Rashtriya Janata Dal (United), Communist Party of India and Lok Janshakti Party.
What do you think about this case?
SpiceJet Tells Delhi HC That It Is Trying For Amicable Settlement On Air Tarrif Dues Owed To AAI
SpiceJet, a commercial airline, has informed the Delhi High Court that it is trying to reach a settlement relating to the payment of tariff dues worth Rupees 158 Crores to the Airport Authority of India. The case was being heard by Justice Rekha Palli. The Top Court had observed therein that the pandemic situation has adversely affected the economy globally and civil aviation sector is not an exception. The case was of SpiceJet Ltd. V. Airport Authority of India.
What do you think about this case?
Delhi High Court Stays CIC Order Requiring TRAI To Furnish Alleged Phone Tapping Information To Advocate Under RTI Act
The case was of TRAI V. Kabir Shankar Bose. The case was being heard by a Division Bench composed of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh. The Delhi High Court on Monday stayed an order of the Central information Commission (CIC), requiring the Telecom Authority of India (TRAI) to collect and furnish information about alleged tapping of an Advocate's phone, in terms of the Right to Information Act.
What do you think about this case?
Karnataka HC Quashes BBMP By Laws Levying Fees On Developers As Ultra Vires Municipal Corporations Act
The case was Sunderam Shetty V. State of Karnataka. The case was heard by Justice M Nagaprasanna. The Karnataka High Court has declared the bye-laws under which the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) demands Ground Rent, Licence Fee, Building Licence Fee, Scrutiny Fee, Security Deposit, from developers to be ultra vires to the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act and held them to be unenforceable.
What do you think about this case?
Calcutta HC Orders Admin To Upgrade VC Facilities In Courts
The case was of Arnab Saha V. Sri Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury & Ors. The matter is currently listed for hearing on August 13, 2021. The Court directed the State as well as the High Court administration to engage service providers including private players for availing the 'best quality of uninterrupted, unbuffered and smooth video conference facilities' and for setting up all necessary equipment and infrastructure as required.
What do you think about this case?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
