Section 92 CPC- Judgment In Representative Suit Binds All Parties Interested In The Trust: SC
The case was of Jamia Masjid v. K V Rudrappa. The decision was given by Justices DY Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli. It has been held by the Court that a suit under Section 92 CPC is of a representative character and all persons interested in the Trust would be bound by the judgment in the suit.
What do you think about this case?
Collection Of OBC Information In Census 2021 Not Feasible : Centre
The Centre has informed the Supreme Court that the exclusion of any caste, other than Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe, from the purview of the Census is a conscious policy decision taken by Central Government. The case was State of Maharashtra v. Union of India.
What do you think about this case?
In India, Every State Action Must Be Fair, Failing Which It Will Fall Foul Of Article 14: Supreme Court
The case was of National Highway Authority of India v. Madhukar Kumar. The decision was given by Justices KM Joseph and S. Ravindra Bhat. The judgment of the Patna High Court was set aside which directed the National Highway Authority of India to shift the toll plaza on Patna-Bakhtiyarpur four-lane road (NH-30) from Karmalichak near Deedarganj.
What do you think about this case?
Assistance Of Experienced Psychologists Or Psycho-Social Workers Or Other Experts Is Mandatory: MPHC
The case was of Ojef Khan v. State of M.P. The decision was given by Justice Shailendra Shukla. It was held by the Court that it is mandatory for the Juvenile Justice Board to take the assistance of experienced psychologists, psycho-social workers or other experts while conducting a preliminary assessment with regard to a child's mental and physical capacity to commit a heinous offence.
What do you think about this case?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
