Should Section 377 of IPC be scrapped? |
|
| Yes | 36 % |
 |
|
| No | 63 % |
|
|
|
| Cant Say | 1 % |
|
|
|
| - | 0 % |
 |
|
| Total Votes Cast : 130 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by Tribhuwan Pandey |
10/07/2009 22:22:42 |
| we should not go against the nature. | |
| Posted by Vivek vashishth |
09/07/2009 17:09:43 |
| I am not agree with delhi Highcourt decesion this is the violation the rules of nature.I think supreme court should be banned these type activities and also decesion should be change. | |
| Posted by AB |
08/07/2009 21:48:03 |
| any liberal amendment making in the sec 377 shows the worst condition of Indian Jurisdiction..... Indian Jurisdiction affected with polio | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
08/07/2009 21:00:12 |
| This sec must not repele | |
| Posted by Ashish Chandra NIgam |
08/07/2009 16:20:13 |
| Kyonki ye manavta ke vipreet hai , prakti ne jo bhi jiske liya banaya hai uska proyog wahi kare toh hi sahi hai , Kyonki agar aaj ye lagu ho gaya toh iski ati galat hogi. | |
| Posted by praveen choudhary |
08/07/2009 15:44:36 |
| I am not satisfied with the decision of the hon'ble delhi high court. BECAUSE SEC 377 IS NOT VIOLATIVE OF ART.21 OF THE CONSTITUTION. SECTION 377 IS UNNATURAL OFFENCE. ACT UNDER SECTION 377 IS NOT NATURAL THING. IF IT IS NATURAL PHENOMENEON THEN IT IS VIOLATIVE OF ART 21. BUT SEC IS COMPLETELY AGAINST HUMAN NATURE. | |
| Posted by Uma parameswaran |
07/07/2009 12:08:51 |
| Section 377 is needed for the society .Keeping the section as it is and give exception with limitation to LGBT is good for the society and its people. Legalization to sexual disorder or retarded sexual behavior would not provide a dignified life.Giving protection from law enforcement authorities and against discrimination is the obligation of the state. Utilize their capabilities for the development of society and for themselves instead of legalizing the distortion. Polyandry or polygamy can be punished because it is a offence but homosexuality could not considered as offence but that orientation needs to control otherwise it affect the society adversely. Human beings are differently endowed. Give more important to moral and ethics than worldly desire and pleasure. | |
| Posted by Ankur Garg |
07/07/2009 10:31:53 |
| No need to scrap section 377. It actually needs revision from the judiciary. | |
| Posted by Santo |
07/07/2009 07:13:02 |
| though we scrap it or not it exist and all knows it. so, what we gonna do with such a dead clause? | |
| Posted by Narayanan.S |
06/07/2009 10:01:42 |
| no it cannot be scrapped | |
| Posted by Raman |
06/07/2009 08:55:32 |
| We need to have S.377, otherwise there won't be any difference between an animal and human in future. In the USA, 70% people still support having Sodomy laws. | |
| Posted by hemant sharma |
04/07/2009 23:23:57 |
| fresh definition required | |
| Posted by Deepak Jain, Hisar |
04/07/2009 21:47:20 |
| it will harm the society and other things/offense and system will be badly affected | |
| Posted by Jaigopal Tiwari |
04/07/2009 13:21:10 |
| Dear Munish Inder Singh, I am fully with your view. It need to be revoked. | |
| Posted by Jaigopal Tiwari |
04/07/2009 13:18:30 |
| Dear friend Atul.N How do we compare India with the culture/traditions of other countries. If other countries are doing some thing, which effect the very importance of the knitting threads of our our most religious strong Secular, Democracatic Soveriegn State, rewarded to the citizens of India. Our Constitutent Shapers, who framed the Constitution of India perhaps were very intelligient, who assured and kept the diginity of all relegiond faith. Why should WE follow other countries and reengineer the Statues without any fruitful just. Please note that and forget the family system and their best traditions, which binds all Indians, morally, traditionally with atrong ties are various religious institutions andf as such India is known to be a Secular State. Let us not touch the factual strong sences/faiths with the Indian citizes, who themselves have constituted the India as Sovereign, Secular state. | |
| Posted by Jaigopal Tiwari |
04/07/2009 13:01:15 |
| customs & traditions are continuously of great importance on earth among it's inhabitants. Statutory Laws had been enacted basically on existibg customs among multi religios followers. Societies, Groups, Casts, Sub-castes since the day/time human beings are known. In India our Laws still on the pattern of British Law. How and why squashing the Sec. 377 of IPC 1860 has/is devoting so much seriousness in 2009. Murdering of religius beliefs and trading seems to serve no purpose except in it scrappng consequesces, to bering another society clash. No Section 377 need to be revoked for better harmony anmong various religious/social/political groups. | |
| Posted by Atul.N |
02/07/2009 19:47:43 |
| when it is repealed in all other countries..so y not in India??? | |
| Posted by munish inder singh |
30/06/2009 19:47:34 |
| 377 is not exclusive in this matter as it s often poised,secondly there s no social acceptance,thirdly there are various uegent issues which require spot intention other than this one | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
