Should judges be addressed as "My Lord", "Your Honour" etc? |
|
| Yes | 43 % |
 |
|
| No | 54 % |
|
|
|
| Cant Say | 3 % |
|
|
|
| _ | 0 % |
 |
|
| Total Votes Cast : 134 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by aman kumar |
17/12/2009 14:32:42 |
| Hon'ble Judges, respected sir may be | |
| Posted by vinod bansal |
25/10/2009 16:38:06 |
| These words remember us slavery of Gore | |
| Posted by Kamal Grover |
25/10/2009 10:48:25 |
| yes coz they can even take any ones life. | |
| Posted by m v ghodke |
24/10/2009 14:08:09 |
| Lord is above all human being,He does not do any wrong even through His thoughts.But the so called Lords of present are bla bla.... | |
| Posted by A Truthseeker |
23/10/2009 13:26:55 |
| unless judges are placed above ordinary realms submissiveness to justice would be difficult. on the other hand if judges feel pampered and placated justice would be distorted. so we are in a dilemma. | |
| Posted by Sudharsan.m |
22/10/2009 18:14:26 |
| i said today in the court "you may" give early date without saying "your lordships" judge warned of this kind of practice, i also apologise for the act. i feel MY LORD or YOUR HONOUR should be given for the seat, i rectified my mistake. | |
| Posted by Ashish Ovalekar |
21/10/2009 14:25:53 |
| Addressing a Judge by "My Lord", "Your Honour", "Lordships", etc., is just way to give respect to the Judges, and in no way intended to have any other meaning. It is the same way as addressing a person as "Sir" or "Madam", which only connotes respect. | |
| Posted by K.C.Suresh |
21/10/2009 05:51:58 |
| Dear Friends Just think the transaltion of Your hounour or mylord. How innoccous it is. In 1st calss magistrate court the advocate submit my lord to get attention or to crte an impression that he is from gods own land. There was a time the judiciary was handled by packka qualified who deserves a lords status. Now what You think twice before calling. Some times a Sir is above average. But what to do the minimum curtosy is Sir. | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
20/10/2009 13:22:49 |
| I think 'sir' should be fine. To address them as 'My Lord' or 'Your Lordship' they have to be worthy. Nowadays their standards are so low addressing them with those words may look awckward. | |
| Posted by ravi kant negi |
19/10/2009 11:05:11 |
| your Honour is fine | |
| Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) |
19/10/2009 06:32:33 |
| They are not gods, they are human beings and now a days most corruptive | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
18/10/2009 21:52:03 |
| what to say i can say 'NO' Though they were in a position to frame law and recommend amendments.. they are also obliged to be 'gentle and humble' as Justice Markandey Katju said. So Sir is enough... But the term 'Sir' too British Honorary .. | |
| Posted by kwrwmdao wary |
18/10/2009 15:15:23 |
| he is also equal to all humanity so "lord" should not be addressed.He must be called as "SIR" or its equivalent. | |
| Posted by VIVEK KUMAR |
18/10/2009 10:19:21 |
| Yes because they are the Respectable and passing orders judicialy and creates the faith in the legal system and litigants also. | |
| Posted by Kiran Kumar |
18/10/2009 08:16:00 |
| the kind of behaviour and professional conduct which is being observed by our Hon'ble Judges, it really hurts while I refer them as My Lord or Your Lordship...but unfortunately the high ups in our profession are not taking adequate steps in this direction. | |
| Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) |
18/10/2009 05:31:53 |
| They are not gods, they are not entittle to call them as My LOrd, Your Honour, they are common men,because of their status they cannot be called like this. Now a days everybody knows that how the judges are? | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
17/10/2009 23:21:01 |
| JUDGES SHOULD ALWAYS BE ADDRESSED AS MAY LORD. | |
| Posted by Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate |
17/10/2009 14:08:07 |
| sir,Admin the words my lord/yr honr is birtish time language,english man wants their flatring,but now y these addressed givin? | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
