Are lawyers taking unnecessary adjournments causing delay in judicial proceedings? |
|
| Yes | 71 % |
 |
|
| No | 25 % |
|
|
|
| Cant Say | 3 % |
|
|
|
| - | 1 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 259 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by Arati Gawde |
08/05/2010 07:57:18 |
| Yes,It's true | |
| Posted by Gaurav Arora |
13/11/2009 23:27:19 |
| yes. they are causing delay in judicial proceedings.... | |
| Posted by Sonali |
13/11/2009 21:20:06 |
| yes i am very much agree with this statement..UNNECESSARY ADJOURNMENTS causes late justice,that means...JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED!!!!!!!!!!! | |
| Posted by Asha Pole |
13/11/2009 15:20:22 |
| when we talk about law of limitation applicability in almost all the cases, why dont we have such limitation for lawyers to wind up any given case in minimum posible time instead of delaying for no sufficient reason.It only reflects the lack of accountability in the judicial system. | |
| Posted by Tribhuwan Pandey |
12/11/2009 19:23:56 |
| Both the judiciary and bar are equally responsible. | |
| Posted by K.C.Suresh |
11/11/2009 12:04:51 |
| The fast track style judicial system lacks clarity and understanding in the facts and circumstances of ht case. Fast track system needs only what is in an FIR and police records. They go to that line with out knowing the legal implications laid down by legend's. This system always cry about heavy adjournments. Adjournments are necessary to study case for collection of evidence etc. Unnecessary depends on each facts. | |
| Posted by anonymus |
09/11/2009 21:59:22 |
| NOT ONLY THEY SEEK ADJOURNMENT BUT WHEN DENIED THEY RESUME TO BOYCOTT SO AS TO GET AN ADJOURNMENT AND INTIMIDATE JUDGES TO GRANT IT. | |
| Posted by jayant tinaikar |
09/11/2009 21:11:43 |
| there is need a special act to avoide unnecessary adjournments by advocates and need a more courts for early disposals of cass which are pending from long back | |
| Posted by DAMUKUMAR.S |
09/11/2009 11:59:26 |
| To ovecome delay in judicial proceddings, the govt should establish more courts | |
| Posted by IRULAPPAN |
09/11/2009 08:40:41 |
| Adjournment is not delay to render justice.Lack of staffs and judicial fraternity to be more effective. | |
| Posted by Pritish Rath |
07/11/2009 12:27:00 |
| The Lawyers should sometimes refrain from such unnecessary delaying tactics. | |
| Posted by H.D.Kumaravelu |
07/11/2009 10:44:15 |
| Adjournments are taken only when circumstances warrant the same in the interest of justice. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
06/11/2009 21:08:03 |
| Both Judiciary and Advocates are responsible. | |
| Posted by Kamal Grover |
06/11/2009 14:23:34 |
| Every aspect is responsible, only advocates are not responsible. Sometimes court has load of work and thats why court made long adornments. | |
| Posted by veerabahu Kannan |
06/11/2009 00:10:11 |
| they are getting adjournments only for the sake of their clients and as per their instructions V.Kannan Madurai 09443154058 | |
| Posted by S.MANIMARAN |
05/11/2009 19:38:42 |
| reasons for taking adjournment is when the party ask for the same or the advocate is having heavy workload | |
| Posted by R.V.PRASAD |
05/11/2009 18:41:49 |
| Taking unnecessary adjournments without reasonable cause. Also delaying tactics is adopting by the lawyers. The judges also taking it as common process. | |
| Posted by Janardhan Rao Kotwal |
05/11/2009 16:20:27 |
| I agree that lawyers are resposible for adjournments. | |
| Posted by ANANDARAJ |
05/11/2009 12:07:28 |
| sure... but what to do??? to fight for our rights? | |
| Posted by Bharat Arora |
05/11/2009 11:00:34 |
| Its lawyers duty to defend his party so delay are teh part | |
| Posted by Upendra awana |
05/11/2009 09:53:21 |
| yes its true | |
| Posted by Learner |
04/11/2009 06:58:36 |
| It is common Tactics i.e to delay Justice to deny it! | |
| Posted by vivek dhavalikar |
03/11/2009 18:22:21 |
| no. advocates practise on the commands of their clients to appear in the court or not.if their were adjournments they were for benefit for their clients. | |
| Posted by Ravi Shankar |
03/11/2009 15:56:09 |
| Sometimes it is necessary but many times it is unnecessary. Any how one may thing it is necessary the opponunt things otherwise. It is inevitable. All in the game. | |
| Posted by SIDHES JENA |
02/11/2009 19:56:34 |
| I am agree with Adinath@Avinash Patil & pkpworld But one thing I would like to make clearer, when every lawyer knows there is thousand of cases are pending since a long time, and here we are not bother about that, why we are not doing our duty properly, I am not making any personal comment, but, it’s hearting me when someone telling that lawyers are cheater, heartily speaking I am not able to keeping mum that’s why I am requesting to my all respected professional friends to come forward and open your voice to make our profession as a Nobel Profession. | |
| Posted by SIDHES JENA |
02/11/2009 19:42:25 |
| I don’t know why we are blaming each other, when we knows that we are the system, then whey we are keeping mum to raising our figure against bad nature. | |
| Posted by kirankumar |
02/11/2009 15:40:47 |
| . | |
| Posted by Adinath@Avinash Patil |
01/11/2009 06:25:09 |
| LAWYERS ARE TAKING UNNECESSARY ADJOURNMENTS IS TRUE IT NOT GOOD FOR THRIR CLIENTS AND JUDICIARY.THERE SHOULD SOME AMENDMENT IN C.P.C AND OTHER PROCEDURAL LAWS TO RISTRICT ADJORNMENTS. IN MY OPINON EVERY LAWYER SHOULD HELP THE JUDICIARY FOR DECIDING MATTERS SPEEDLY. | |
| Posted by pkpworld.. |
31/10/2009 06:03:47 |
| There should be a time limit for disposal of any case or proceeding like so in the Income Tax Act, 1961. For completion of any scrutiny assessment procedding the Income Tax Act provides 21 month time for disposal. How many adjournments allowed or availed by the party within such perood is no matter but the assesse should be aware or bind to law about the limitation of time of a disposal of a any case. Sometimes seeking adjourment to time is essential on fact and circumstances of the case, but should be availed within a limit of time. | |
| Posted by SHEKHAR MISHRA |
30/10/2009 20:15:27 |
| adjournments are part of judicial proceedings. | |
| Posted by Sudharsan.m |
30/10/2009 15:02:09 |
| some time i feel why i have chosen this profession because of unnecessary adjournments. | |
| Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) |
30/10/2009 05:39:29 |
| No, it depends on the circumstances. Advocates are always concerned about their clients interest, they have to protect whatever it may be. | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
29/10/2009 23:58:48 |
| Some times it may happen. But the whole society is also responsible for the same | |
| Posted by Kiran Kumar |
29/10/2009 21:03:57 |
| unfortunately its happening....but judiciary is also responsible for this. | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
