Would scrapping of 3 year law course help to achieve qualitative legal education? |
|
| Yes | 52 % |
 |
|
| No | 46 % |
|
|
|
| Cant say | 2 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 166 | |
| Submitted By - Asha Pole | Read Comments |
| Posted by charushila |
05/04/2010 14:07:36 |
| It depends upon individual.. it upon u to gain knowledge from the 3 years course of LL.B | |
| Posted by Gagan Gupta |
02/03/2010 10:33:52 |
| Question is faulty, as if person has practical experience in life or he studied higher education if they go for 3yrs course they will be better than 5 yrs student. | |
| Posted by Bidhan Dave |
01/03/2010 22:23:42 |
| Ram Jethmalani & Soli Sorabji are also product of 3 year course. Qualitative legal education depends upon the dedicated teachers. | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
26/02/2010 21:35:58 |
| . | |
| Posted by MOHAMMED SHAKEEL |
26/02/2010 18:42:15 |
| Professionalism have to be from the Ground level.People adopt profession for recognition not justified. | |
| Posted by Gundlapallis |
25/02/2010 17:06:05 |
| Its not the duration that upholds the quality.. but the standards of examination. Compare law course with CA and ICWA. | |
| Posted by Yamalapalli Haribob |
24/02/2010 20:28:59 |
| TO BEECOME GOOD ADVOCATE,HE MUST STUDY 5 YEARS LAW | |
| Posted by Anitha Serrao |
24/02/2010 09:43:16 |
| Further, I completely agree with both the comments posted by Suresh. | |
| Posted by Anitha Serrao |
24/02/2010 09:41:36 |
| One problem with the law course is that it is only theory based and no practical training is made compulsory as in case of other Professional Courses like CA where 3 years articleship is a must and the rest is a correspondence couse. Including the same in the curriculum may add to the quality of advocates on getting out of law universities | |
| Posted by AjayKumar Kalagi |
22/02/2010 15:21:14 |
| it must be 4 years or more because there are many laws which he has to more perfect in it to become a successful lawyer. | |
| Posted by NIKLESH MAHAVIR KALA |
22/02/2010 11:58:06 |
| i not all about qualitative legal education within three years its students expetctioin towards law and toward truth resp. | |
| Posted by ANANTH IMARATI |
21/02/2010 12:05:06 |
| 3year law course give more stability for prograss inlgal pracice | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
20/02/2010 21:30:44 |
| . | |
| Posted by Suresh |
20/02/2010 01:51:05 |
| I say Make the Law 2 Years and 1 year give student compulsory attendance in District Courts for attending various cases atleast(Petty)with the helpof Courtmaster and Judge.This reduces burden of court and increases efficiency in system of Education and Judicial System at the same time. | |
| Posted by Suresh |
20/02/2010 01:35:11 |
| There is no use in increasing years spent in education with out qualitative methodology. I say Make the Law 2 Years and 1 year give student compulsory attendance in District Courts for attending various cases atleast(Petty) with the help of Court master and Judge .. This reduces burden of court and increases efficiency in system of Education and Judicial System at the same time | |
| Posted by Lilly rose |
19/02/2010 22:37:00 |
| I do not understand this poll Ms ASHA POLE - SCRAPPING OF 3 Yr LAW COURSE?????? | |
| Posted by vijay mehta |
19/02/2010 17:48:55 |
| 2 years practical training under Sinior Advocate be made compulsary before granting certificate of practice. | |
| Posted by Lakshmi Singh |
19/02/2010 14:58:32 |
| yes it will be a good idea cause studin 4 three year wil hav a good effect on som1 | |
| Posted by Rohtash Babu Patel |
17/02/2010 21:28:08 |
| because it is increasing the number of collages and the study is not that focused | |
| Posted by Parveen Kr. Aggarwal |
16/02/2010 00:57:18 |
| Mere scrapping of three years' course would not yield any result. The requirement is to revise the syllabus. The syllabus must have stress on the practical learning and professional ethics than on the academic aspect. | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
14/02/2010 20:50:21 |
| No need to scrap three year course. It gives more knowledge to the students as they are from different graduation and they can also have a different view towards law. | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
13/02/2010 20:02:30 |
| I dont think scrapping of three year's course would help. Rather revising the syllabus of three year's course is needed. And also, in legal profession, dedication to the profession, and constant up gradation of knowledge brings qualitative lawyers, be it three year student or five year student. | |
| Posted by R Karthikeyan |
13/02/2010 14:48:03 |
| yes, i dont have any second thought | |
| Posted by R Karthikeyan |
13/02/2010 14:47:38 |
| yes, i dont have any second thought | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
